Inconsistent
Inconsistent legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
"Inconsistent"-Meaning
- Word "Inconsistent" - Meaning.
"Inconsistent", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3619
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Inconsistent"
1992 S C M R 1062
Government Department, Quetta and 3 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus Messrs SHERS14AH INDUSTRIES LTD., KARACHI
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1953 Lahore 131
ALA‑UD‑DIN‑Defendant‑Appellant Versus Mst. FARKHANDA AKHTAR‑Plaintiff‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1982 Karachi 774
Petitioners Versus QAMRUDDIN M. KHIMANI AND 4 others
Court:1985 C L C 2146
St. JOHN AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION (Pakistan) — Plaintiff Versus PAKISTAN RED-CROSS SOCIETY and another — Defendants
Court: Karachi2002 Y L R 2109
SOWAB GUL‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SARDAR MUHAMMAD and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Peshawar1999 M L D 3038
ZAHOOR AHMED — Appellant Versus Syed NAZIR HUSSAIN RIZVI — Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 2005 Supreme Court 787
Syed NAZIR HUSSAIN RIZVI — Petitioner Versus ZAHOOR AHMAD and another — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1982 Quetta 19
SHERSHAH INDUSTRIES LTD., KARACHI Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALUCHISTAN AND 4 OTHERS‑‑ Respondents '
Court: S. 63, Baluchistan Local Government Act (XII of 1975), S. 138 and Baluchistan Local Government Ordinance (IX of 1979), S. 145 read with Basic Democracies Order (18 of 1959), Art. 60 and Administrator, . District Council, Lasbela's authorisation to collect tax dated 30‑6‑1979 and Union Council Hub's Notification dated 2‑7‑1962‑Import tax‑ Validity‑Taxing statutes authorising imposition of taxes on import and export of goods for use, consumption and sale, any goods neither used, nor consumed, nor sold in local council, held, not liable to imposition of tax‑Scrap though brought within limits of Union Council yet taken away to Port Town for its use, consumption or sale, held further, merely passed through Union, Town Committee and could not be subject to taxation.‑Interpretation of statutes.P L D 1984YSupreme Court 241
Mst. SAKINA B1B1-Appellant Versus CRESCENT TEXTILE MILLS LTD. AND OTHERS — Respondents
Court: Employees' Social Security Ordinance, 1965 could not be resolved by resort to any general assumptions viz, either both parts reacting on each other c: same remaining independent of each other.-Interpretation of statutes.P L D 1978 Karachi 64
CORPORATION EMPLOYEES' UNION, KARACHI‑Petitioner Versus NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN AND ANOTHER -Respondents
Court: