Home Maxims & Terms Vest meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Vest

Vest legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1975 PLD 37 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Words and Phrases "Vest"-Does not by itself connote "vest in title".

1959 PLD 658 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Words and Phrases Vest-Vesting of plot of land in person connotes such person's possession of land and his exercising control over it.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Vest", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3711

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Vest"

PLC(CS) 2022
N/A

2022 P L C (C

GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary Health and 3 others Versus MUHAMMAD KAMRAN BASHIR and 6 others

Court: Lahore High Court (Multan Bench)
CLC 1988
Constitutional Petition No. D‑630 and Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 1507 to 1509 of 1988, decided on 8th June, 1988.

1988 C L C 1718

Messrs TARIQ BROTHERS‑‑Petitioner Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Court: Karachi
PLD 1967
Civil Revision Case No. 386 of 1961, decided on 14th July 1965.

P L D 1967 Dacca 546

Haji AKHTARUZZAMAN‑Petitioner Versus JADUNATH PAL AND ANOTHER Opposite‑Parties

Court:
SCMR 1987
Civil Appeal No.253 of 1981, decided on 13th May, 1987.

1987 S C M R 1197

through LAHORE CHURCH COUNCIL‑‑Appellant Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through SECRETARY

Court: ‑‑‑Paras. 5, 12, 12‑A & 12‑B as added by Privately Managed Schools and Colleges (Taking Over) (Amendment) Order (6 of 1983)‑‑Word "vest" occurring in para. 5 of M.L.R. 118‑‑Connotatipn‑‑Merely because the privately managed schools, alongwith their assets were to vest in the Government, under the terms of para. 5 of Martial Law Regulation No.118, it did not imply that Government had become owner in relation o the buildings wherein schools or colleges were being run‑‑Provisions of para. 5 M.L.R. 1‑18 were neither intended to nor in terms have the effect of making Government the owner of the property.‑‑Words and phrases.
CLD 2005
2005-June-2

2005 C L D 1255

FIRST CAPITAL SECURITIES CORPORATION LTD. — Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER (SECURITIES MARKET DIVISION) S.E.C.P. and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PTD 1966
The problem presented in these appeals falls to be decided on a true construction of section 41 of the Act. The material part of section 41 reads

1966 P T D 293

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, MADRAS Versus MANAGING TRUSTEES, NAGORE DURGHA

Court: Supreme Court India
PLD 2024
2024-September-18

P L D 2024 Supreme Court 1168

The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and others — Appellants Versus MEKOTEX (PVT.) LIMITED and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1951
Insolvency Case No. 29 of 1947, decided on 27th March, 1950.

P

Court:
CLC 1995
Writ Petition No. 234 of 1987/BWP, decided on 13th December, 1994

1995 CLC 626

CANTONMENT BOARD through Executive Officer‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Court: Lahore
PLD 1963
Second Appeal from Order No. 166 of 1962, decided on 30th April 1963.

P L D 1963 (W

ABDUS SALAM-Appellant Versus WAHEED-UD-DIN-Respondent

Court: