Tenancy
Tenancy legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Tenancy may not be necessarily through written document and the same can be oral.
Must be proved-Cannot be inferred-Person can (in absence of statutory provision) become tenant with consent of landlord only.
Tenancy -Period of tenancy expiring but tenant continuing in possession-Position of such tenant, not that of a trespasser but that of a "tenant holding over".
Holding over-Non-agricultural land lying within limits of Sylhet Municipality-Governed by Transfer of Property Act, 1882-Person taking lease of land belonging to Wakf estate continuing, after termination of lease period, to be in occupation and possession of land for mire than 33 years without break or interruption-Presumption of holding over of tenancy by him. Auction purchaser of such land acquires, at most, right, title and interest in land but tenancy right of occupant remains unaffected. Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), S 116.
S. 117-TenancyPrfnciple of holding over-Applicable to agricultural land as wellAgricultural tenant holding over and paying rent -Possession of such tenant that of tenant by holding over
Tenancy, in circumstances, held, to be of tenancy from year to year.
Holding over-Tenant continuing in possession must prove assent to such continuance or acceptance of rent by landlord.
Tenancy-Interpretation-Ordinary implication of tenancy, in absence of anything to contrary is that rent is payable monthly.
"Tenancy", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3729
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Tenancy"
P L D 2010 Lahore 463
WAJID ALI — Petitioner Versus RENT REGISTRAR/SPECIAL JUDGE RENT, LAHORE and another — Respondents
Court: High Court1986 C L C 693
REHMAT KHAN‑‑Appellant Versus KHUDA BUX‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi1989 M L D 2785
NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN — Appellant Versus Mst. BILQUIS BEGUM — Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1978 Lahore 1276
KHUSHI MUHAMMAD ETC.-Appellants Versus BOOTA ETC.-Respondents
Court: S. 59--Occupancy right - Record-of-rights excluding possibility that tenant inherited right from his father-No presumption arises in such case in favour of fact that his father was occupancy tenant at one time-Customary law-Held, not applicable in matters of tenancy--Collaterals whose common ancestor had held land as occupancy tenant can only inherit an issueless tenant.-Custom (Punjab).P L D 1962 (W
Dr. PESHOTON‑Plaintiff Versus PEEROZSHAW AND ANOTHER‑Defendants
Court:2001 C L C 120
ABDUL QAYYUM KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus AHMAD KHAN and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Board of Revenue Punjab2015 Y L R 1617
ZAHEER AHMAD BABAR — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1980 C L C 1201
KHUSHI MUHAMMAD ETC. — Appellants Versus BOOTA ETC.-Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2004 Lahore 494
Dr. NISAR ALI KHAN and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus P.I.A. through Chairman and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1962 (W
ABDUL AZIZ AND OTHERS-Appellants Versus GUL ZAHID SHAH AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: