Home Maxims & Terms Act of God meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Act of God

Act of God legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2002 YLR 3930 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent

When an act would become impossible due to natural calamity, none could be charged for its omission or commission and things would have to be rearranged accordingly.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Act of God", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/37349

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Act of God"

PCRLJ 2016
2014-November-14

2016 P Cr

TABISH GAUHAR — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh
PLD 1995
Civil Appeal No.33 of 1994, decided on 12th April, 1995.

P L D 1995 Karachi 329

and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus Mst. BIBI RUKHSANA BEGUM and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: prove that it was innocent and the incident/accident was the "Act of God"‑‑ Mere claim that any act was the "Act of God" would have no force in it.‑ Words and phrases. p. 333 A
SCMR 1996
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 158‑P of 1995, decided on 20th May, 1996.

1996 S C M R 1713

P.W.D., Peshawar and 4 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus DAUD SHAH, CONTRACTOR, PESHAWAR‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 1999
1998-August-24

1999 M L D 13

NISAR AHMED and others — Plaintiffs Versus Messrs HOSPITAL SUPPLY CORPORATION and others — Defendants

Court: Karachi
SCMR 1982
Civil Petition No. 369 of 1977, decided on 27th October, 1981.

1982 S C M R 779

Mian ABDUL LATIF-Petitioner Versus ZAHOOR DIN — Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1980
Letters Patent Appeal No. 175 of 1967, decided on 10th August, 1978.

P L D 1980 Karachi 74

Appellants Versus PAKISTAN SHIPPING CORPORATION, KARACHI AND ANOTHBR-

Court: -- Scbed., Art. IV, para. 2-Immunity from liability-Burden of proof Burden to prove that loss occurred due to an excepted cause, held, falls on ship owner-Prima facie case of loss falling within exception made out-Burden of proof, held further, shifts to consignee for showing ship owner being not entitled to benefit of exception on ground of negligence.-Burden of proof.
CLD 2005
N/A

2005 C L D 643

MUHAMMAD NAEEM BHATTI and others — Appellants Versus UNITED BANK LIMITED and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1998
Suit No.200 of 1985, decided on 5th August, 1997

1998 C L C 139

MUHAMMAD YASEEN‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus MEDICARE CLINIC LTD and 2 others‑‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi
CLC 1995
Regular First Appeal No. 77 of 1992, decided on 15th September, 1994.

1995 C L C 83

ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD, N: W.F.P. and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus Mst. GUL ZARINA and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Peshawar
CLC 1982
Suit No. 259 of 1978, decided on 23rd February, 1982

1982 C L C 1703

MRS. NIMMI FRANCIS AND 5 OTHERS‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SAEED QURESHI AND ANOTHER‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi