Void Transaction
Void Transaction legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Limitation with respect to a void transaction neither runs nor the efflux of time would extinguish the right of the inherence.
Limitation did not run against void transaction nor efflux of time would extinguish the right of inheritance.
Remedy of specific performance of a contract being equitable in nature cannot be granted to enforce a transaction declared void by a statute.
If a transaction was genuinely entered into between parties but the saint was treated as void under any provision of law, other remedial incidents and reliefs available to parties under the transaction could be resorted to.
"Void Transaction", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3775
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Void Transaction"
2014 M L D 1820
HAZRAT ISA — Petitioner Versus GUL AMIN and 28 others — Respondents
Court: PeshawarP L D 1963 W
QUTAB DIN‑Petitioner Versus FAZAL KARIM‑Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1962 W
MUHAMMAD KHALAS‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AKBAR AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court:1994 S C M R 281
MUHAMMD KHAN and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus FAZAL MUHAMMAD and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2010 SCMR 978
ABDUL REHMAN and others — Appellants Versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD through L.Rs. and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2001 C L C 97
MUHAMMAD HANIF‑‑‑Appellant Versus Raja MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN and 8 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2016 S C M R 1417
PEER BAKSH through LRs and others — Petitioners Versus Mst. KHANZADI and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2000 C L C 1395
MUHAMMAD SHARIF and 6 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB, LAHORE and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2025 Lahore 724
MUHAMMAD MANZOOR — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI through legal heirs and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1965 (W
MUHAMMAD ISHAQ‑ — Appellant Versus Sh. MANLOOR‑UL‑HASSAN & BROS.‑ — Respondents
Court: