Home Maxims & Terms Waive meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Waive

Waive legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1999 MLD 883 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Waiver"

Meaning elaborated.

1984 PLD 261 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

"Waive"?Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Waive", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3781

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Waive"

PLD 2006
2006-March-8

P L D 2006 Peshawar 82

MUHAMMAD ZAMAN — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: High Court
PTD 1985
O. P. No. 2645 of 1980, decided on 22nd June, 1983.

1985 P T D 737

THE KERALA STATE CASHEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. Versus THE INCOME‑TAX OFFICER, C‑WARD, TRIVANDRUM AND ANOTHER

Court: Kerala High Court (India)
PTD 2000
Civil Writ Petitions Nos.13865 and 13599 of 1996, decided on 6th February, 1997.

2000 P T D 1916

MOHD. YOUSUF and another Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and another

Court: 235 I T R 329
PTD 1993
MA. (EH) No.106/KB, TTA No.8121/KB and ITA No.8122/KB of 1992-93, decided on 30th November, 1992.

1993 P T D 627

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PCRLJ 2001
2000-May-24

2001 P Cr

MUHAMMAD JAMIL — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 2012
2011-June-23

2012 M L D 682

RAJIB ALI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh
YLR 2005
Crl. M. No. 407/M in Criminal Appeal No.234 of 1999 and Murder Reference No.454 of 1999, decided on 19th October, 2004.

2005 Y L R 1163

MUHAMMAD YAR — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1965
Civil Appeals Nos. 22‑D and 22‑A/D of 1963, decided on 12th January 1965.

P L D 1965 Supreme Court 352

(2) MUHAMMAD ISLAM‑Appellants Versus RIVER STEAM NAVIGATION Co. LTD., CHITTAGONG‑Respondents

Court: (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 58‑Leave to appeal to Supreme Court‑Granted to consider whether .suit was pre mature, having regard to period of notice prescribed by S. 109(1), Chittagong Port Act (V of 1914) and liable to be dismissed .as such.
MLD 1987
Regular Second Appeal No.642 of 1$77, decided on 14th April, 1984.

1987 M L D 2359

SARWAR KHAN and others — Appellant Versus Mst. KHADIJA — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PTD 1997
Civil Appeals Nos 1334 to 1338 of 1981, decided on 13th January, 1997.

1997 P T D 1940

Smt. HARBANS KAUR Versus COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX

Court: 224 I T R 418