War Risks (Ships) Insurance Scheme 1965
War Risks (Ships) Insurance Scheme 1965 legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Liability of Shipping Company would accrue only if goods were proved to have been shipped on vessel and loss accrued during voyage
Burden, held, would be on plaintiff to prove that goods were actually shipped
Plaintiff producing documents purporting to be bills of lading but same not bearing signatures of either Shipping Company, or agent thereof
Original bills of lading neither produced by plaintiff nor any other document produced to show that goods were ever shipped
Plaintiffs only witness admitting that he was not present at time of shipment of goods
Where factum of shipment of cargo remained unproved, and plaintiff also failed to prove nature, quantity and value of goods, liability of insurance company, held, would not accrue to insurance claim of war risk cover
Suit by plaintiff claiming war risk cover of insurance claim would stand dismissed for want of proof of claim.
Ss. 13 & 6(1)-Insurance-Vessel-Cover against war risk-Relevant correspondence brought on record showing that request was made by Shipping Company to Insurance Company for insurance of three vessels including vessel in suit for certain sum in respect of each and Bank guarantee enclosed therewith for all three vessels-Insurance Company in their correspondence neither denying cover of vessel in suit against war risk nor denying receipt of premium from Shipping Company in respect of insurance
Cover of Ship in suit, held, established against war risk.
"War Risks (Ships) Insurance Scheme 1965", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3787
Precedents & Case Laws citing "War Risks (Ships) Insurance Scheme 1965"
P L D 1983 Karachi 550
PAKISTAN NATIONAL SHIPPING CORPORATION Plaintiff Versus PREMIER INSURANCE COMPANY OF PAKISTAN LTD. AND 2 OTHERS-Defendants
Court:1986 M L D 1392
Messrs ABDUL GHAFFAR KASAM — Plaintiff Versus Messrs ADAMJEE INSURANCE COMPANY Ltd. and 3 others- -defendants
Court: Karachi1993 C L C 1284
KARACHI‑‑‑Appellant Versus PAKISTAN NATIONAL. SHIPPING CORPORATION and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 1978 Lahore 844
GARDEE INVESTMENT LTD., LAHORE-Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF
Court: Para. 6 read with War Risks Insurance Rules, 1971, r. 7-Vires of Mules-Rule 7 ,providing a formula for easy ascertainment and determination of rent value and there being no other provision in War Risks Insurance Ordinance, 1971 laying down any formula for ascertainment of insurable value, Central Government, held, could make rules in such regard-Rules in such respect being necessary for carrying out purposes of Ordinance objection regarding r. 7 being in excess of rule-making authority overruled.-Vires of ruleP L D 1976 Karachi 673
PAKISTAN CHROME MINES LTD., KARACHI‑Petitioner Versus THE ENQUIRY OFFICER, WAR RISK INSURANCE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: Valid and existing piece of legislation‑No male fides generally or specifically in legislating Ordinance proved‑Held, Ordinance cannot be struck down by Court‑Interpretation of statutes‑Mala fide intention cannot be imputed to Legislature.‑Interpretation of statutes.P L D 1977 Karachi 954
PAKISTAN WARRANTED WAREHOUSE LTD., KARACHI‑ — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND 4 others — ‑Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1977 Karachi 978
PAKISTAN CHROME MINES LTD.‑Petitioner Versus ENQUIRY OFFICER, WAR RISKS INSURANCE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court:2020 P T D (Trib
Messrs PAKISTAN RE-INSURANCE CO. LTD., KARACHI Versus The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI
Court: Inland Revenue Appellate TribunalP L D 1981 Karachi 357
PAKISTAN‑Petitioner Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE. ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS
Court: ‑--S. 115‑Estoppel‑Admission or consent by a party not in consonance/conformity with relevant provisions of law, held, does not constitute estoppel against such party.‑Estoppel.1981 P T D 277
MOTILAL PADAMPAT SUGAR MILLS Co. LTD. Versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS
Court: Supreme Court of India