Jurisdiction, Ouster of
Jurisdiction, Ouster of legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Principles to be kept in view enumerated:
"Jurisdiction, Ouster of", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/37918
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Jurisdiction, Ouster of"
P L D 1976 Lahore 346
WALI MUHAMMAD ETC. Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF ETC.-Respondents
Court: --Ss. 77(3)(h), (i) & 114(2)(a), (b)-Revenue Courts-Civil Courts- Jurisdiction, ouster of-Civil suit for joint possession against defen dants, some alleged to be occupancy tenants of land in dispute whose terms and conditions of tenancy envisaged payment to land lords of half share of produce-Subject-matter of suits, held fell within provisions of S. 77, attracted prohibition contained in S. 77(3), cls. (a) & (b) and jurisdiction of civil Court ousted-Mere fact of' Revenue Appellate Court having observed in his judgment that he would refrain from holding that subject-matter of case fell within S. 114(2)(a) or (b) because no issue had been framed whether batai in fact was or was not being paid to landlords and landlords could seek remedy in proper Court, held, could not confer jurisdiction upon civil Court.-Jurisdiction.P L D 1976 Quetta 44
ZAHOOR AHMED AND 2 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, BALUCHISTAN AND 3 OTHERS-Respondents
Court: -- S. 4-Jurisdiction, ouster of-Case once drawn under Ordinance, superior Courts bereft of their supervisory jurisdiction-Matter, how ever, different if cognizance taken and case registered not in con formity with provisions of Ordinance-Assistant Commissioner dismissing complaint but later re-admitting matter by way of review and issuing process-No provision for review existing in Ordinance, Assistant Commissioner exercised power not contemplated by Ordi nance and worked within sphere not allotted to him by Ordinance Tribunal of exclusive jurisdiction not functioning within substance and form of special statute, held, cannot claim immunity on basis of ouster clause-Order of admission of complaint being beyond jurisdiction of Assistant Commissioner, and as such a nullity, any superstructure thereon, held further, suffers from same blemish falls to ground and nothing could be propped up on such a tottering foundation.-jurisdiction-Review.P L D 1978 Karachi 612
Syed MUSHTAQUE HUSSAIN SHAH‑Petitioner Versus RIAZ MUHAMMAD HAZARVI AND ANOTHER‑‑
Court: ‑‑ S. 65‑Civil Court‑Jurisdiction‑Ouster of‑Section 65 of Ordi nance XXIII of 1969‑Held, does not oust jurisdiction of civil Court to entertain any dispute concerning a right or liability created by and required to be adjudicated under Ordinance but only grants immu nity from legal proceedings to persons bona fide acting in persuance of Ordinance.‑Jursidiction.2022 M L D 227
Syed MOHAMMAD HASSAN RAZA RIZVI and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: Islamabad1998 C L C 563
TAJUDDIN KHAN‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus HABIB BANK LTD. and 3 others ‑Defendants
Court: Karachi1998 P L C (C
Agha Syed ALI RAZA SHAH and 11 others Versus PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION
Court: Karachi High CourtP L D 1967 Lahore 432
SHARIF AHMAD-Petitioner Versus DILDAR BEG ETC.-Respondents
Court:1988 P Cr
UZMA VAHID‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD JAVED UMRAO‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2001 C L C 1461
COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CUSTOMS HOUSE NABHA ROAD. LAHORE‑‑‑Appellant Versus ABDUL MAJEED‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1984 P L C (C
NASIR AHMAD Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INFORMATION/CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN
Court: Lahore High Court