May Consider
May Consider legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Connotation.
"May Consider", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/37922
Precedents & Case Laws citing "May Consider"
P L D 1984 Supreme Court 1
MUHAMMAD YAQOOB alias QOOBI Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: S. 497 (1)(b)-Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302-Case remained pending before Military Court which finally transferred to Court of Session on application from accused-Delay in trial-Case fixed for recording of evidence on 10 different dates but adjourned because either one or other accused absented himself or was not brought to Court by . jail authorities-Some part of delay caused due to absence of accused-Refusal to grant bail to accused, on account of delay in trial, by High Court, held, justified in circumstances Supreme Court however, disapproved practice of allowing number of adjournments by Sessions Judges in murder trials holding that murder trial are required to be completed with utmost expedition and that in case Court feels that accused on bail, were absenting themselves deliberately in order to delay completion of trial, their bail may be cancelled-Jail authorities failing to produce accused on any dates of hearing, trial Judge may consider taking action for contempt against such authorities.-Contempt of Court.2001 P Cr
ALLAH BACHAYA and 3 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1999 Lahore 207
Dr. SHAHIDA NASREEN, ADDITIONAL MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT, SERVICES HOSPITAL, LAHORE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB through Vice‑Chancellor, Lahore and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court:PLD1992 Lahore 235
Mst. AZRA PARVEEN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Rana SAEED AHMAD‑‑Respondent
Court:1985 P Cr
AKBAR and 2 others‑‑Applicants/Accused Versus THE STATE‑‑Opponent/Complainant
Court: Karachi2003 C L C 1310
Dr. RUQIA SHAUKAT — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2014 Y L R 1319
TALIB HUSSAIN — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Sindh2017 P Cr
NADEEM AHMED RAJPUT — Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh (Sukkur Bench)2003 P T D 2633
Messrs UNITED BANK LIMITED, KARACHI Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman2019 P Cr
Mst. RAHILA BATRA — Petitioner Versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU through Chairman and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh