Home Maxims & Terms West Pakistan Forest Manual meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

West Pakistan Forest Manual

West Pakistan Forest Manual legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2012 YLR 1909 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Rr.15.10 (1) & (2)Contempt of Court Ordinance (IV of 2003), S.3Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 204Contempt of CourtProofAllowance in lieu of firewood quota to non-gazetted employees of Forest DepartmentDirection to decide the quota in accordance with rules and regulation

Petitioners were non-gazetted employees of Forest Department, who filed contempt petition against authorities on the plea that they did not comply with directions of the High Court

Validity

Nowhere, in West Pakistan Forest Manual, 1964, 20% allowance in lieu of firewood quota was allowed to non-gazetted employees of Forest Department

Petitioners were claiming something not envisaged in West Pakistan Forest Manual, 1964, therefore, authorities could not be forced under the garb of contempt proceedings to do something that was not permitted by law

High Court had not granted relief prayed for by petitioners and mere direction was issued to the authorities for decision of representation which had been complied with by authorities

If petitioners were aggrieved of decision of Finance Department declining their claim, they should have availed alternate remedy permissible to them under the law

Contempt proceedings could not be initiated for advantage of one particular party, rather initiation of contempt proceedings was to safeguard and protect institution which created balance in the society

Petition was dismissed in circumstances.

1983 PLC 1218 SERVICE-TRIBUNAL-PUNJAB Judicial Precedent
West Pakistan Forest Manual

Paras. 2.7 & 2.8 (vii) read with Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975, r. 4-Forest Guard and ` Forester charged for misconduct and inefficiency resulting in loss of trees and timber

-Penalty of removal from service and recovery of loss imposed upon Forest Guard and that of censure and stoppage of one increment upon Forester

Ire view of prescribed, duties both accused, held, responsible for supervision and protection of forest-Punishment awarded to Forest Guard, in circumstances, held, unduly severe and discriminate particularly in view of his long service of r,`, 21 years-Penalty of removal from service, in circumstance, altered by Service Tribunal to same as awarded to Forester-Penalty of recovery of loss upon Forest Guard, however, held, justified in view of his duties as prescribed in para. 2.8 (vii) of West Pakistan Forest Manual, 1964, Vol. II regarding regular patrol of forest in his beat

Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S. 4.

1983 PLD 53 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

R. 15.51(2)(f)-Realization by receipt-Provisions of r. 15.51(2)(f) of Manual being mandatory in nature, realization of money by a receipt printed or on a form prescribed for purpose, held, necessary and no receipt issued otherwise legal except when permits for petty quantities of forest produce or for grazing issued immediately on receipt of payment.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "West Pakistan Forest Manual", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3829

Precedents & Case Laws citing "West Pakistan Forest Manual"

PLC 1983
Case No. 214/1776 of 1982, decided on 20th March, 1983.

1983 P L C (C

BASHIR AHMAD Versus CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, MULTAN CIRCLE AND ANOTHER

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
YLR 2012
Criminal Original No.1881-W of 2012 in Criminal Original No.649/W of 2011 in Writ Petition No.2314 of 2011, decided on 7th March, 2012.

2012 Y L R 1909

BADAR MUNEER and 4 others — Petitioners Versus BADAR HASSAN BHARWANA and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2005
Crl. Revision No.453 of 2003, decided on 2nd July, 2004.

2005 Y L R 994

SAJJAD AHMAD and 3 others — Petitoners Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 1980
Appeal No. 105 of 1979, decided on 4th December 1979.

1980 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD SARWAR Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
PLD 1983
Regular Second Appeal No. 286 of 1971, decided on 7th July, 1982.

P L D 1983 Lahore 53

Before M. Mehboob Ahmad, J Versus Raja BASHIR MUHAMMAD KHAN-Respondent

Court: '-R. 15.51(2)(d)-Interpretation of rule-Amount in. excess of Rs. 100, held, can be received in cash only in exceptional circumstances.-Interpretation of statutes.
SCMR 1968
Civil Appeal No. 2-D of 1966, decided on 27th November 1967.

1968 SCMR 262

NAWAB MUHAMMAD FARED KHAN-Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN REPRESENTED BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES-Respondents

Court: Martial Law Regulation C. M. L. A's. No. 64 paras. 3 & 27 read with Land Reforms Manual, Vol. 1, para. 50-Deputy Land Commissioner although aware ofsuit concerning proprietorship of land upholding entries in revenue records but at same time observing in his order "it is outside my jurisdiction to investigate the dispute over the ownership of the forest land in question"-Order of resumption passed by him, held provisional despite fact that he failed to state so specifically in his order-Civil suit brought to call in question correctness of entry in Revenue records, in such circum stance, held, not rendered inco mpetent-Mere fact that under para. 3 of Regulation the Land Reforms Authorities could ignore decree passed by Civil Court-Does not rule out the equal power of authorities to accept decisions of civil Courts.
SCMR 1998
N/A

1998 S C M R 36

Fisheries & Wildlife, Peshawar and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 1996
Writ Petition No.225 of 1995, decided on 2nd April, 1996.

1996 C L C 1447

GUJAR KHAN and 3 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W.F.P. and 16 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Peshawar
YLR 2021
2017-November-7

2021 Y L R 991

AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR through Secretary Forests, Muzaffarabad and 2 others — Appellants Versus ALI UMAR and 20 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
PLC(CS) 2000
Civil Appeal No. 149 of 1995, decided on 16th January, 1998.

2000 P L C (C

N/A

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan