West Pakistan Forest Manual
West Pakistan Forest Manual legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioners were non-gazetted employees of Forest Department, who filed contempt petition against authorities on the plea that they did not comply with directions of the High Court
Validity
Nowhere, in West Pakistan Forest Manual, 1964, 20% allowance in lieu of firewood quota was allowed to non-gazetted employees of Forest Department
Petitioners were claiming something not envisaged in West Pakistan Forest Manual, 1964, therefore, authorities could not be forced under the garb of contempt proceedings to do something that was not permitted by law
High Court had not granted relief prayed for by petitioners and mere direction was issued to the authorities for decision of representation which had been complied with by authorities
If petitioners were aggrieved of decision of Finance Department declining their claim, they should have availed alternate remedy permissible to them under the law
Contempt proceedings could not be initiated for advantage of one particular party, rather initiation of contempt proceedings was to safeguard and protect institution which created balance in the society
Petition was dismissed in circumstances.
Paras. 2.7 & 2.8 (vii) read with Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975, r. 4-Forest Guard and ` Forester charged for misconduct and inefficiency resulting in loss of trees and timber
-Penalty of removal from service and recovery of loss imposed upon Forest Guard and that of censure and stoppage of one increment upon Forester
Ire view of prescribed, duties both accused, held, responsible for supervision and protection of forest-Punishment awarded to Forest Guard, in circumstances, held, unduly severe and discriminate particularly in view of his long service of r,`, 21 years-Penalty of removal from service, in circumstance, altered by Service Tribunal to same as awarded to Forester-Penalty of recovery of loss upon Forest Guard, however, held, justified in view of his duties as prescribed in para. 2.8 (vii) of West Pakistan Forest Manual, 1964, Vol. II regarding regular patrol of forest in his beat
Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S. 4.
R. 15.51(2)(f)-Realization by receipt-Provisions of r. 15.51(2)(f) of Manual being mandatory in nature, realization of money by a receipt printed or on a form prescribed for purpose, held, necessary and no receipt issued otherwise legal except when permits for petty quantities of forest produce or for grazing issued immediately on receipt of payment.
"West Pakistan Forest Manual", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3829
Precedents & Case Laws citing "West Pakistan Forest Manual"
1983 P L C (C
BASHIR AHMAD Versus CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, MULTAN CIRCLE AND ANOTHER
Court: Service Tribunal Punjab2012 Y L R 1909
BADAR MUNEER and 4 others — Petitioners Versus BADAR HASSAN BHARWANA and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2005 Y L R 994
SAJJAD AHMAD and 3 others — Petitoners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore1980 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD SARWAR Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB AND OTHERS
Court: Service Tribunal PunjabP L D 1983 Lahore 53
Before M. Mehboob Ahmad, J Versus Raja BASHIR MUHAMMAD KHAN-Respondent
Court: '-R. 15.51(2)(d)-Interpretation of rule-Amount in. excess of Rs. 100, held, can be received in cash only in exceptional circumstances.-Interpretation of statutes.1968 SCMR 262
NAWAB MUHAMMAD FARED KHAN-Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN REPRESENTED BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES-Respondents
Court: Martial Law Regulation C. M. L. A's. No. 64 paras. 3 & 27 read with Land Reforms Manual, Vol. 1, para. 50-Deputy Land Commissioner although aware ofsuit concerning proprietorship of land upholding entries in revenue records but at same time observing in his order "it is outside my jurisdiction to investigate the dispute over the ownership of the forest land in question"-Order of resumption passed by him, held provisional despite fact that he failed to state so specifically in his order-Civil suit brought to call in question correctness of entry in Revenue records, in such circum stance, held, not rendered inco mpetent-Mere fact that under para. 3 of Regulation the Land Reforms Authorities could ignore decree passed by Civil Court-Does not rule out the equal power of authorities to accept decisions of civil Courts.1998 S C M R 36
Fisheries & Wildlife, Peshawar and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1996 C L C 1447
GUJAR KHAN and 3 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W.F.P. and 16 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Peshawar2021 Y L R 991
AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR through Secretary Forests, Muzaffarabad and 2 others — Appellants Versus ALI UMAR and 20 others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)2000 P L C (C
N/A
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan