Home Maxims & Terms Fair Price Shop meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Fair Price Shop

Fair Price Shop legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2010 PTD 1861 INCOME-TAX-APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
Ss.3A & 2 (25)Turnover taxClubFair price shopTaxation of

Assessee contended that all items which were sold by the Club through its fair price shop were on which tax had been charged at its manufacturing as well as whole-sale stage; and he was not liable to pay sales tax as no value addition had been made by the Club while selling the items through its shop

Validity

Assessee being covered within the thresh-hold should have been charged under S.3A of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 and not under the other. normal provision

Items purchased from a fair price shop of a Club which inter cilia included milk, tooth paste, tooth brush, beverages,_ bakery items and such other items of daily use after purchasing from manufacturer or the whole-seller were without charge of sales tax

If there could be a doubt about the same the charge of tax on turnover had taken due care of the situation for the said period

Matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer; and in the meantime the assessee may at his option apply for registration being liable to be registered under S.2(25) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 in order to avail the said facility.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Fair Price Shop", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/38723

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Fair Price Shop"

PLC(CS) 1984
Petition No. MI‑113 of 1984, decided on 28th May, 1984.

1984 P L C 1545

SUBEDAR GHULAM HUSSAIN SHAH Versus FAUJI SUGAR MILLS, FAUJI SUGAR MILLS LTD., SHEIKHUPURA

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
SCMR 1968
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 48 of 1968, decided on 26th June 1968.

1968 S C M R 1296

MUHAMMAD RIAZ‑Petitioner Versus JIWAN KHAN‑Respondent

Court: High Court
PLC 1995
Appeal No. HYD‑461 of 1992, decided on 28th September, 1994.

1995 P L C 72

Messrs PANGRIO SUGAR MILLS LIMITED, BADIN through General Manager Versus ABID HUSSAIN

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh
PLC 1997
Writ Petition No. 84 of 1992, decided on 5th August, 1996.

1997 P L C 34

ABDUL RASHID Versus CHAIRMAN, LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, N.W.F.P., PESHAWAR and 2 others

Court: Peshawar High Court
MLD 2020
2019-August-27

2020 M L D 696

UMAR MUKHTAR — Appellant Versus The STATE through Director General Regional Accountability Bureau and others — Respondents

Court: Balochistan
PTD 2007
Sales Tax Appeal No.1207/LB of 2003, decided on 6th March, 2006.

2007 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Customs, Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal
PTD 2010
S.T.A. No. 1577/LB of 2009, decided on 22nd April, 2010.

2010 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan
PLD 1981
Inter-Court. Appeal No. 7`. of 1981, heard on 17th May 1981.

P L D 1981 Lahore 505

Pir MANZOOR ALI-Appellant Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, GOVERNMENT

Court: -- S. 409 read with. S. - 405 .and Prevention of Corruption Act (Il of 1947), S. 5(2) read with Pakistan Criminal Law Amendment Act (XL of 1958), S. 5(6)-Criminal breach of trust-Public servant entrusted with private property as a responsible man but not as public servant-Held, cannot be c barged, incapacity of public servant, for offence of dishonestly misappropriating such property. Order granting sanction for prosecution of such public servant-Held, void altogether and without lawful authority and consequential order -of suspension also falls through.-Sanction for prosecution.
PLC 1977
Miscellaneous Appeals Nos. 96 of 1974 and 18 of 1976, decided on 16th November 1976.

1977 P L C 447

SIND EMPLOYEES' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION, KARACHI Versus PHILIPS ELECTRICAL INDUSTHES OF PAKISTAN LTD. AND ANOTHER

Court: Karachi
PLD 1977
Miscellaneous Appeals Nos. 96 of 1974 and 18 of 1976, decided on 16th November 1976.

P L D 1977 Karachi 451

SIND EMPLOYEES' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION, KARACHI‑ — Appellant Versus PHILIPS ELECTRICAL INDUSTRIES OF PAKISTAN LTD. AND ANOTHER‑ — Respondents

Court: ---S. 2(8), (9), (30)‑"Employee" ; "employer" ; "wages"‑Defini tion‑Collective ingredients of concept of employment : employer, his employee and contract of employment between two‑Persons engaged by independent Contractor for work assigned to him by owner of an industry‑Owner of such industry, held, not an "employer" in respect of persons engaged by Contractor.‑Words and phrases.