Industry
Industry legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Stated.
In order to constitute "Industry" it was necessary that organisation must have profit as one of its motive, holding it otherwise, would mean that every company and every industrialist, would be able to escape the dragnet of Industrial Relations, Act, 2008 by constituting a trust even a Waqf-alal-Aulad Trust, stating that since the purpose was charitable, it was not Industry
Court had to look at the activity and not the motive for such activity in order to arrive at the conclusion, whether the activity fell in definition of `Industry' or not
Motive for the activity, was not of much importance
Profit motive, in circumstances, was not an essential ingredient for bringing an organization within the definition of `Industry'
Profit was not a sine qua non for bringing an activity within the ambit of Industry.
"Industry", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/38736
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Industry"
1971 P L C 134
HYDERABAD Versus THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN
Court: Sind Labour Appellate Tribunal2001 P L C 589
BOARD OF GOVERNORS AITCHISON COLLEGE, LAHORE Versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL and others
Court: Supreme Cot‑ t of Pakistan1960 P T D 630
UJJAIN OIL MILLS PRIVATE LTD. Versus THE SALES TAX OFFICER, UJJAIN
Court: Madhya Pradesh (India)P L D 1986 Lahore 393
ISLAMABAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES, ISLAMABAD‑Petitioner Versus RAWALPINDI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, RAWALPINDI‑Respondent
Court:2001 S C M R 1928
BOARD OF GOVERNORS AITCHISON COLLEGE, LAHORE‑‑‑Appellant Versus UNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1998 P T D 930
GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and others Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Court: 227 I T R 4142016 P L C 160
Messrs KARACHI CLUB STAFF WORKERS' UNION through General Secretary Versus PRESIDING OFFICER, SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.5 and another
Court: Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal2001 P L C 450
UTILITY STORES CORPORATION, VEHARI Versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, UTILITY STORES
Court: National Industrial Relations Commission1972 P L C 87
ABDUL HAMID Versus BROOKE BOND (PAKISTAN) LTD., LAHORE
Court: Punjab Labour Court2009 PTD 1602
PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LIMITED (PTCL) through Regional General Manager, Lahore Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, Lahore and 3 others
Court: Lahore High Court