Home Maxims & Terms Category meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Category

Category legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2023 MLD 1354 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S. 278Letter of AdministrationDistant kinderCategoryPetitioner sought issuance of Letter of Administration in favour of legal heirs of deceased owners of suit propertiesValidity

Children of pre-deceased sister and brother fell under the category of distant kinder and were only to inherit share when there was no sharer and residuary

When brothers and sisters of an unmarried and issueless deceased had also died, being sharer and residuary, respectively, distant kinder could inherit

Wife of petitioner was daughter of predeceased brother of deceased owner of estate

After the death of wife of petitioner, her legal heirs would also get their proportionate inheritance in the estate along with other shareholders

Petition was allowed accordingly.

2023 CLC 499 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss.11 & 43

Complaint Resolution Procedure (Natural Gas, Liquefied Petroleum Gas [LPG], Compressed Natural Gas [CNG] and Refined Oil Products) Regulations, 2003

Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 42 & 54

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXXIX, Rr.1 & 2

Suit for declaration and injunction

Interim injunction, refusal of

Gas connection

Category

Civil Court, jurisdiction of

Plaintiff companies were licensed as Export Oriented Units who claimed enhanced supply of natural gas for consumption of their units

Validity

Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority, under Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002, had ample powers to determine any nature of dispute between a licensee and the Customer / Consumer (present Plaintiffs) hence suits are not maintainable

Provision of S.43 of Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002 had an overriding effect

Jurisdiction of Civil Court plenary in nature was not specifically ousted, yet exclusive jurisdiction vested in concerned Authority and provisions of Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002, had barred jurisdiction of a Civil Court

Even an injunctive relief could be granted by the Authority under Complaint Resolution Procedure (Natural Gas, Liquefied Petroleum Gas [LPG], Compressed Natural Gas [CNG] and Refined Oil Products) Regulations, 2003

High Court declined injunctive relief as gas connections were restored and Industrial Units of plaintiffs were running

High Court directed the Authority to formulate and implement a Policy, which should not result in closure of businesses of consumers, including present plaintiffs, as the same would be violative of Arts.18 & 24 of the Constitution, relating to trade, business and proprietary rights

Plaintiffs were at liberty to invoke jurisdiction of Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority, in accordance with Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002, and other Regulations

Application was dismissed accordingly.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Category", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/38754

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Category"

YLR 2016
Constitutional Petition No. D-2997 of 2015, decided on 22nd March, 2016.

2016 Y L R 2439

MUHAMMAD UMAR QURESHI — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Vice-Chancellor and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)
CLC 1995
Writ Petition No. 2860 of 1995, decided on 2nd April, 1995.

1995 C L C 1511

Mst. SHAZIA ANJUM‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary Health and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2005
C.P. No.159 of 2004, decided on 13th April, 2005.

2005 Y L R 2063

Miss MEHAK HASNAIN — Petitioner Versus SELECTION COMMITTEE and others — Respondents

Court: Quetta
YLR 1999
Constitutional Petition No‑73 of 1999, decided on 30th August, 1999.

1999 Y L R 1586

Miss GUL MARINA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SELECTION COMMITTEE through Chairman, Selection Committee Bolan Medical College, Quetta and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Quetta
PLC(CS) 2007
Civil Petition No.1596 of 2003, decided on 25th July, 2005.

2007 P L C (C

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Versus Mrs. ZAKIA LATIF and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2006
Civil Petition No. 1596 of 2003, decided on 25th July, 2005.

2006 SCMR 84

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION — Petitioner Versus Mrs. ZAKIA LATIF and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 1996
Civil Appeal No.1180 of 1991 and connected appeals and Civil Appeals Nos.5441 and 5450 of 1995, decided on 28th April, 1995.

1996 P T D 939

GOSAR FAMILY TRUST and others Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and others

Court: 215 I T R 55
PLC(CS) 1991
Appeals Nos.157‑L of 1987 and 542‑R of 1989, decided on 29th May, 1990.

1991 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD SARWAR Versus SECRETARY, FINANCE DIVISION and others

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
YLR 2001
Constitutional Petition No.377 of 2000, decided on 30th October, 2000.

2001 Y L R 1820

FOUZIA REHMAN KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SELECTION COMMITTEE and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Quetta
PLC 2008
Cases Nos.IT(N.-W.F.P.)5/2000/C and IT(N.-W.F.P.)6/2000/C, decided on 25h September, 2006.

2008 P L C 368

AMJAD ALI KHAN Versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE, DAILY MASHRIQ, PESHAWAR

Court: Implementation Tribunal for Newspaper Employees