Home Maxims & Terms Composition meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Composition

Composition legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2024 PCrLJ 1903 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 19Joint Investigation Team (JIT)CompositionObjection over inclusion of two police officers in the JIT

Without any evidence of bias against any member of Joint Investigation Team, nomination cannot be objected on the basis of apprehensions.

2021 PLD 544 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
PreambleCompositionPrincipleCivil Procedure Code, 1908, is an amalgam of substantive and procedural laws

Substantive part contains provisions enacting fundamental principles of procedural law but rules provide procedure to be followed by Courts in application of those principles.

2020 PLD 89 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Art. 160(1)National Finance Commission (NFC)Composition

Federal Secretary for Finance cannot be included in NFC through any notification as the same is against relevant provision of the Constitution

Finance Secretaries of Federal and Provincial Governments can assist their respective Ministers before or during the meetings of NFC.

2020 PLD 89 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Arts. 92, 132 & 160(1)National Finance Commission (NFC)CompositionAdvisor to Prime MinisterEligibilityTerms of Reference

Petitioner assailed notification issued by the President, constituting NFC, in which Advisor to Prime Minister on Revenue and Finance was included in the Commission who was to chair the meetings of Commission and also fixed Terms of Reference for the NFC

Validity

Purpose of appointing Federal and Provincial Ministers as permanent Statutory Members of NFC was because they were elected representatives and part of their respective cabinets

Such members were under Constitutional oath, once on becoming members of Parliament and Provincial Assemblies and then before entering into the offices of Federal or Provincial Ministries respectively

Such Members were chosen representatives well conversant with the problems and needs of people whom they represented and were also collectively responsible to the Parliament and Provincial Assembly

Federal and Provincial Ministers had been made permanent members of NFC by designation only

No one including an Advisor to Prime Minister or Advisor to Chief Minister could replace Federal and Provincial Finance Ministers

Notification in question was clear enough, according to which in absence of Federal Minister of Finance, the Advisor to Prime Minister was to chair the NFC

According to Art. 160 of the Constitution, the President had no power to do so, as such the Advisor to Prime Minister could not act on behalf of the Federal Minister of Finance in NFC

If Prime Minister was holding portfolio of Federal Minister of Finance, he in his capacity as Minister of Finance could attend the meeting of NFC

Scope and mechanism for NFC to be followed was provided in Art.160 of the Constitution

Any direction contrary to the provisions of Art.160 of the Constitution with regard to proceedings of NFC was unconstitutional

Terms of Reference made by the President with direction to the members of NFC to follow the same were illegal and unconstitutional

President and NFC were bound to follow whatever the Constitution of Pakistan empowered them

High Court set aside the notification to the extent of appointing Advisor to Prime Minister as member of NFC

High Court also set aside the Terms of Reference made by the President for NFC

Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Composition", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/38784

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Composition"

PTD 2012
Complaint No.572/LHR/IT(449)/1157 of 2011, decided on 30th December, 2011.

2012 P T D 401

MUHAMMAD SALEEM SARWAR Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
YLR 2006
Writ Petition No.7933 of 2003, decided on 1st October, 2003.

2006 Y L R 1185

GHULAM ABBAS — Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB through Vice-Chancellor and

Court: Lahore
PLD 1989
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.12‑R of 1988, decided on 8th April, 1989.

P L D 1989 Supreme Court 444

Messrs KHAYAL MUHAMMAD AND SONS‑‑Petitioner Versus Messrs PAKISTAN TOBACCO COMPANY LTD., JHELUM and 3 others‑‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1989
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.12‑R of 1988, decided on 8th April, 1989.

P L D 1989 Supreme Court 444

Messrs KHAYAL MUHAMMAD AND SONS‑‑Petitioner Versus Messrs PAKISTAN TOBACCO COMPANY LTD., JHELUM and 3 others‑‑Respondents

Court:
PTD 2012
Complaint No.24/ISD/ST(08)/242 of 2012, decided on 22nd February, 2012.

2012 P T D 1402

Messrs MIA CORPORATION, ISLAMABAD Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
PLD 1972
23rd October 1970

P L D 1972 Karachi 62

Insolvency Case No. 3 of 1962

Court: High Court
MLD 1990
Constitutional Petition No. D‑416 of 1986, decided on 16th November, 1989.

1990 M L D 905

BROOKE BOND PAKISTAN LIMITED‑‑Petitioner Versus KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION and 2 others‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
SCMR 2005
---- Act of public functionaries---Principle---When statute specifically requires a public functionary to act in a particular manner, it must act in that manner and the Courts have all the power to see as to whether it acted in that manner or not---Reasonableness or otherwise of an act is a question of fact which at times requires to be decided on the basis of evidence but in certain cases even the evidence is not required.

2005 S C M R 177

STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN through its Chairman and another — Petitioners Versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, MILITARY LANDS AND CANTONMENTS, RAWALPINDI and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 2003
Constitutional Petition No.420 of 2000, heard on 11th December, 2002.

2003 M L D 627

Messrs RABIA CITY, RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION (REGD.) ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus CANTONMENT BOARD, FAISAL CANNT and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PTD 1999
Original Petition No. 12693 of 1993, decided on 2nd July, 1996.

1999 P T D 2775

Before V. V Kamat and P. A Mohammed, JJ Versus VI P. JOHN, JANATHA MEDICALS

Court: 229 I T R 475