Home Maxims & Terms Income or Capital Expenditure meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Income or Capital Expenditure

Income or Capital Expenditure legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1961 PTD 370 KERALA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Timber business-Agreement for exploitation of forest areas by removal of timber and making area fit for cultivation-Consideration paid in instalments-Purchase of entire land later-Consideration paid for agreement-Whether capital expenditure. In the course of his timber business the assessee entered into an agreement on October 5, 1950, with a company for exploitation of certain undeveloped forest and regular plantation areas belonging to the company. Under the terms of the agreement, the assessee was to cut the timber and to make the area fit for plantation. The consideration for the agreement was Rs. 1,20,000 of which Rs. 25,000 was paid before the date of the agreement and the balance was payable in four annual instalments. On August 31, 1951, the assessee purchased the property outright for a further consideration of Rs. 30,000, and mortgaged it to the company for the payment of the instalments due. Until September 30, 1951, the assessee did not do any exploitation himself. Thereafter, on October 1, 1951, he entered into another agreement with another company for exploitation of the entire area for a kuttikanam. The question was whether the sum of Rs. 1,20,000 represented capital or revenue expenditure:

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Income or Capital Expenditure", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/38824

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Income or Capital Expenditure"

PTD 2000
I.T.R. No. 59 of 1993, decided on 24th October 1996.

2000 P T D 1575

CONTINENTAL. TOURIST HOME Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 234 I T R 65
PTD 1999
Miscellaneous Civil Case No.70 of 1992, decided on 15th A15ri1, 1996.

1999 P T D 929

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus M.P. AUDHYOGIK VIKAS NIGAM LTD.

Court: 225 I T R 782
PTD 1966
These tests have again been referred to as the principles formulated in determining the question as to whether a given item of expenditure is a capital or a revenue expenditure in State of Madras v. G. J. Coelho ((1964) 53 I T R 186) already referred to. In a still more recent decision of the Supreme Court given in the case of Bombay Steam Navigation Co. I,td. v. Commissioner of Income‑tax ((1964) 54 I T R 21 (Sh. N)), decided on 21st October, 1964 (not yet fully reported (2), it has been observed

1966 P T D 233

S. F. ENGINEER (A FIRM) AND OTHERS Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, BOMBAY CITY I

Court: Bombay (India)
PTD 1985
Income‑tax Reference No. 114 of 1973, decided on 23rd October, 1984.

1985 P T D 359

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus Messrs PAKISTAN PROGRESSIVE CEMENT INDUSTRIES Ltd.

Court: Karachi High Court
PTD 2000
O.P. Nos.24656 and 17756 of 1998, decided on 18th December, 1998.

2000 P T D 3573

MAHESH B. SHAH Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and another

Court: 238 I T R 130
PTD 1985
Income‑tax Reference No. 114 of 1973, decided on 23rd October, 1984.

1985 P T D 662

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX (CENTRAL ZONE), KARACHI Versus MESSRS PAKISTAN. PROGRESSIVE CEMENT INDUSTRIES LTD.

Court: Karachi High Court
PTD 2000
Income-tax Reference No.61 of 1982, decided on 9th December, 1997.

2000 P T D 2446

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus RENUSAGAR POWER CO. LTD.

Court: 236 I T R 177
PTD 1998
Tax Reference Case No. 1 of 1990, decided on 4th December, 1996.

1998 P T D 173

PUNJAB STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: Supreme Court of India
PLD 1962
Reference Case No. 9 of 1960, decided on 17th August 1961.

P L D 1962 Dacca 86

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, DACCA Versus TANGAIL GENERAL TRADING & TRANSPORT CORPORATION LTD., MYMENSINGH

Court:
PTD 1993
Application No.37 of 1984, decided on 18th June, 1992.

1993 P T D 1352

A.R. BHUIYAN & Co. Versus COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, DHAKA (SOUTH) ZONE, DHAKA

Court: Dhaka High Court