Income or Capital Expenditure
Income or Capital Expenditure legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Timber business-Agreement for exploitation of forest areas by removal of timber and making area fit for cultivation-Consideration paid in instalments-Purchase of entire land later-Consideration paid for agreement-Whether capital expenditure. In the course of his timber business the assessee entered into an agreement on October 5, 1950, with a company for exploitation of certain undeveloped forest and regular plantation areas belonging to the company. Under the terms of the agreement, the assessee was to cut the timber and to make the area fit for plantation. The consideration for the agreement was Rs. 1,20,000 of which Rs. 25,000 was paid before the date of the agreement and the balance was payable in four annual instalments. On August 31, 1951, the assessee purchased the property outright for a further consideration of Rs. 30,000, and mortgaged it to the company for the payment of the instalments due. Until September 30, 1951, the assessee did not do any exploitation himself. Thereafter, on October 1, 1951, he entered into another agreement with another company for exploitation of the entire area for a kuttikanam. The question was whether the sum of Rs. 1,20,000 represented capital or revenue expenditure:
"Income or Capital Expenditure", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/38824
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Income or Capital Expenditure"
2000 P T D 1575
CONTINENTAL. TOURIST HOME Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Court: 234 I T R 651999 P T D 929
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus M.P. AUDHYOGIK VIKAS NIGAM LTD.
Court: 225 I T R 7821966 P T D 233
S. F. ENGINEER (A FIRM) AND OTHERS Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, BOMBAY CITY I
Court: Bombay (India)1985 P T D 359
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus Messrs PAKISTAN PROGRESSIVE CEMENT INDUSTRIES Ltd.
Court: Karachi High Court2000 P T D 3573
MAHESH B. SHAH Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and another
Court: 238 I T R 1301985 P T D 662
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX (CENTRAL ZONE), KARACHI Versus MESSRS PAKISTAN. PROGRESSIVE CEMENT INDUSTRIES LTD.
Court: Karachi High Court2000 P T D 2446
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus RENUSAGAR POWER CO. LTD.
Court: 236 I T R 1771998 P T D 173
PUNJAB STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Court: Supreme Court of IndiaP L D 1962 Dacca 86
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, DACCA Versus TANGAIL GENERAL TRADING & TRANSPORT CORPORATION LTD., MYMENSINGH
Court:1993 P T D 1352
A.R. BHUIYAN & Co. Versus COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, DHAKA (SOUTH) ZONE, DHAKA
Court: Dhaka High Court