Home Maxims & Terms Capital Loss Or Revenue Loss meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Capital Loss Or Revenue Loss

Capital Loss Or Revenue Loss legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1961 PTD 861 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Purchase of shares in company for acquiring its managing agency-Loss on resale of shares­

Whether capital loss or revenue loss-Income-tax Act (XI of 1922), S. 66-Reference to High Court-Legal effect of facts found

­Question of law. The appellant company was a dealer in shares and securities and also carried on business as managing agents of other com­panies. In order to acquire the managing agency of a textile mill, the appellant company purchased from the existing manag­ing agents thereof, 1,507 shares of the mill at Rs. 2,321-8-0 per share at a time when the market price of the shares was Rs. 1,610. The remaining 1,000 shares of the mill held by the Managing Agents were acquired by the directors of the appellant company. Two months later the appellant company sold 400 of those shares at a loss of Rs. 1,78,438 and this loss was claimed as a trading loss:

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Capital Loss Or Revenue Loss", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/38836

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Capital Loss Or Revenue Loss"

PTD 1980
Civil Rule No. 1399 (W) of 1973, decided on 12th August, 1975.

1980 P T D 358

R. L. RAJGHARIA Versus INCOME‑TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS

Court: Calcutta (India)
PTD 1996
Income-tax Reference No.389 of 1982, decided on 4th October, 1993.

1996 P T D 462

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus SANDOZ (INDIA) LTD.

Court: 20 I T R 599
PLD 1978
Income‑tax Reference No. 3 of 1970, decided on 8th. March 1978.

1978K135

Before I. Mahmud and Z. A. Channa, JJ Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX‑Respondent

Court: ‑ . S. 66(1)‑Question of law‑Income‑tax Tribunal on basis of certain facts found by it concluding transaction regarding purchase and sale of shares by assessee to be incidental to his business and consequently taxable‑Inference or conclusion thus drawn from facts, held, raises a question of law.‑Question of law.
PTD 2016
P.T.Rs. Nos.270, 271 and 272 of 2005, decided on 1st March, 2016.

2015 P T D 2091

PRIME COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. Versus INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 1995
Income-tax Reference No. 139 of 1991, decided on 31st, March 1993.

1995 P T D 215

KRISHNA CHANDRA DUTTA (COOK ME) PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 204 I T R 23
PTD 2001
T. C. No. 2118 of 1984 (Reference No .1574 of 1984), decided on 28th April, 1998.

2001 P T D 3488

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus R. CHIDAMBARANATHA MUDALIAR

Court: 240 I T R 552
PTD 2000
Income-tax Reference No.61 of 1982, decided on 9th December, 1997.

2000 P T D 2446

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus RENUSAGAR POWER CO. LTD.

Court: 236 I T R 177
PTD 2002
I.T.As. Nos. 1486/KB to 1488/KB of 2000-2001, decided on 21st August, 2001.

2002 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 1999
Income-tax Case No.65 of 1993, decided on 25th July, 1997:

1999 P T D 2822

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus OM PARKASH

Court: 228 I T R 722
PTD 2024
Income Tax Cases Nos.10, 11 of 1994 and Income Tax Reference No.137 of 1994, Income Tax References Nos. 95, 193 and 194 of 2001, decided on 28th September, 2023.

2024 P T D 1448

Messrs COTTON EXPORT CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. KARACHI and others Versus The COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES-III, KARACHI and others

Court: Sindh High Court