Property
Property legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Title was to be decided on the basis of evidence and not on presumptions and conjunctions.
Such term comprises of bundle of rights, which a person is capable of enjoying to his advantage giving rise to some privilege, benefit or monetary gain by exercise of such right
Property may be in shape of fixed assets or object or a right in intangible property, such as trade mark, goodwill or trade name, royalty etc.
"Property", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/38851
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Property"
1984 C L C 2022
Seth KESHOMAL AND ANOTHER‑‑ — Petitioners Versus THE SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER AND 2 OTHERS — ‑Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 1975 Karachi 964
CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF AUQAF, SIND AND ANOTHER- Appellants Versus IBRAHIM SHAH (REPRESENTED BY 5 HEIRS) AND 2 OTHERS-Respondents
Court:1994 C L C 628
CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF AUQAF, PUNJAB, AIWAN‑E‑AUQAF, LAHORE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Court: Lahore2009 S C M R 210
AUQAF DEPARTMENT through Chief Administrator Auqaf, Punjab, Lahore — Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RELIGIOUS ZAKAT, USHAR AND MINORITIES AFFAIRS GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD and 3 others-Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2026 C L C 937
CANTONMENT BOARD NOWSHERA through Executive Officer Nowshera Cantt, Tehsil and District Nowshera and another — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Religious Affairs and Interfaith Harmony, Islamabad and 6 others — Respondents
Court: IslamabadP L D 2001 Supreme Court 75
CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, AUQAF, SINDH, THANDI SARAK, HYDERABAD and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. MASOOMA‑‑‑Respondent
Court:1992 C L C 313
KALIM ULLAH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1985 P T D 571
MESSRS ABDUL KAREEMIA AND BROTHERS VIJAYAWADA Versus COMMISSIONER OP INCOME‑TAX ANDHRA PRADESH
Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court (India)P L D 1975 Lahore 833
ISAB KHAN AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD SHER AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: ‑As amended, S. 3‑A and Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958), S. 4‑Word "treated" in S. 3‑A of Act XII of 1957‑Property must be treated as evacuee property by some overt, or conscious act by Custodian or Rehabilitation Authority‑Mere entry in revenue record without any authority would not divest real owner of his title‑Acquisition of such property under S. 4 of Act XLVII of 1958 and its disposal under Act‑Would be without lawful authority.2000 M L D 100
EVACUEE TRUST PROPERTY and others‑‑‑Applicants Versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi,