Home Maxims & Terms Legal Practice meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Legal Practice

Legal Practice legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2004 PLD 285 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
"Practice"Defined

Necessary ingredients enlisted.

2004 PLC(CS) 208 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
Legal practice', 'practice of law', 'in practice' and 'professional'

Meaning and scope explained.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Legal Practice", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/38857

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Legal Practice"

PLD 1967
Civil Miscellaneous No. 439-C of 1966 in R. F. A. No. 55 of 1962, decided on 27th January 1967

P L D 1967 Lahore 882

HAIDAR AUTOMOBILES LTD.-Appellant Versus PAKISTAN-Respondent

Court:
PLC(CS) 2004
Writ Petitions. Nos.438 of 2002 and 90 of 2003, decided on 9th June, 2003.

2004 P L C (C

ABDUL SHAKOOR and others Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR through Chief Secretary and others

Court: Azad J&K
PLD 2007
2006-December-22

P L D 2007 High Court (AJ&K) 1

Khawaja IFTIKHAR AHMED and another — Petitioners Versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, GOVENRMENT through Chief Secretary, Muzaffarabad and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1981
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 113 of 1979, decided on 10th March, 1979.

1981 S C M R 508

HABIB BANK LTD.-Petitioner Versus MEHR MUHAMMAD SHAHID AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1989
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.354 of 1985, decided on 21st March, 1989.

P L D 1989 Supreme Court 344

GHULAM AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE and 2 others‑‑Respondents

Court:
CLC 1993
Intra‑Court Appeal No. 615 of 1991, heard on 20th October, 1992.

1993 C L C 81

MUHAMMAD MAZHAR‑‑‑Appellant Versus CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Court: Lahore
PLD 1965
Civil Appeal No. 41 of 1965, decided on 18th June 1965.

P L D 1965 Supreme Court 527

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN‑Appellant Versus (1) Syed AKHLAQUE HUSSAIN

Court: (f) Retired Judges (Legal Practice) Order (21 of 1962), Art. 3(1)‑"Undertakings" not to practice after retirement given by ex‑Judges of High Court‑Held, wholly effaced by Order also against Judges who were "removed" from office‑Per Cornelius, C. J., Kaikaus and Sattar, JJ. concurring, S. A. Rahman, Fazle‑Akbar and Muhammad Yaqub Ali, JJ., dissenting.
PLD 1965
Writ Petition No. 217 of 1964, decided on 28th October, 1964.

P L D 1965 (W

Court: (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1962), as amended, Arts. 98, 6 & 133 (3)‑Vires of enactment challenged‑Reliefs mentioned in Art. 98 not appropriate remedy‑Petitioner can claim relief by way of declaration that Fundamental Right conferred by Constitution is not affected by that particular enactment ‑High Court for purpose of granting or withholding such declaration competent to consider and give finding on question of vires of impugned enactment qua rights of petitioner.
PLC(CS) 2004
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 176 of 2003, decided on 5th September, 2003.

2004 P L C (C

ABDUL SHAKOOR Versus Mrs. SHAMIM KHALIL and 5 others

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
PLD 2018
2018-January-25

P L D 2018 Supreme Court 337

SHAHID ANWAR BAJWA — Appellant Versus S.M. ASIF and others — Respondents

Court: High Court