Take
Take legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Connotation.
"Take", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/38872
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Take"
1970 S C M R 645
MIAN MUHAMMAD-Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1979 Quetta 156
Before Mir Hazar Khan Khoo, J FARID‑Petitioner Versus ALLAH WASAYA‑Respondent
Court: Ss. 190 & 193‑Cognizance‑Court of Session‑Not a Court of original jurisdiction, hence, can take cognizance of case only when sent to it by a Magistrate‑Direct taking cognizance of a complaint filed before it by a Sessions Court, held, in utter violation of provisions of S. 193 and liable to be quashed.‑Cognizance.PL D 1959 (W
THE STATE‑Applicant Versus SAMIULLAH KHAN and others‑Opponents
Court:2019 C L D 1082
ORIENT POWER COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED — Appellant Versus SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED through Managing Director, Lahore — Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 2019 Lahore 607
ORIENT POWER COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED — Appellant Versus SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED through Managing Director, Lahore — Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1976 Lahore 755
MOHABAT ALI‑Petitioner Versus THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, CAMPBELLPUR AND ANOTHER
Court: ‑‑ S. 30‑Taking out procession‑Not forbidden under S. 30 even where breach of peace is apprehended‑Organisers of procession to be required to apply for licence if breach of peace apprehended ‑Provision made for measures to ensure that public order is not dis turbed‑Keeping of order, however, not to be secured by refusing citizens their right of assembling and forming procession.‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1892), S. 144.2022 Y L R Note 7
Syed MUHAMMAD RAZA QAIM RIZVI — Petitioner Versus The STATE and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh1997 M L D 588
MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, LAHORE and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1994SCMR2177
RIFFAT HAYAT‑‑‑Appellant Versus JUDGE SPECIAL COURT FOR SUPPRESSION OF TERRORIST
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2004 C L C 1630
TARIQ HASSAN — Petitioner Versus BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN through VICE-CHANCELLOR and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore