Examination of Civil Engineering
Examination of Civil Engineering legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Supreme Court on account of hostile attitude and mala fides on the part of Engineering University nominated three independent and impartial persons to reevaluate two papers of the appellant
Appellant after re-evaluation secured first position in such papers
University, despite such position, did not declare result of appellant, over which Supreme Court directed the University to declare his result and issue him requisite certificates
University did not invite appellant to attend Convocation, over which Supreme Court again directed the University to award him degree and medals in a ceremonial manner, but University handed over the same to him in a sealed cover
University, in order to assess capability of appellant required him to take practical and viva voce examination of final year
Appellant apprehended that University would not give him fair deal in such matter, thus, Supreme Court appointed an ex Superintending Engineer for such purpose
Such Engineer found appellant over all capable towards his technical know-how regarding all his final year subjects sectional work, practical and viva voce examination excellent, which was compatible with marks obtained by him in relevant theory papers
Supreme Court accepted appeal with directions to University to notify result of appellant, award him all medals, certificates and with request to Engineering Council to register him as Engineer.
"Examination of Civil Engineering", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/38902
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Examination of Civil Engineering"
2004 S C M R 606
MUHAMMAD USMAN QAYYUM — Appellant Versus UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, LAHORE and 5 others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2000 P L C (C
GHULAM MUSTAFA Versus PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN, PRESIDENT'S SECRETARIAT, ISLAMABAD and 3 others
Court: Federal Service TribunalP L D 1996 Supreme Court 182
MUHAMMAD SADIQ and others ‑‑‑ Appellants Versus UNIVERSITY OF SINDH and another ‑‑‑ Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑‑ S. 10(2) ‑‑‑ Word "may" as used in S.10(2), Pakistan Engineering Council Act, 1976 ‑‑‑ Connotation ‑‑‑ Word "may" involves a choice and word "shall" involves an order ‑‑‑ Such would be the customary usage of the terms when they appear in a statute ‑‑‑ Even enabling word like "may" would become mandatory, when object was to effectuate a legal right.‑‑Words and phrases.2019 P L C (C
MAULA BUX SHAIKH and others Versus CHIEF MINISTER SINDH and others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2018 S C M R 2098
MAULA BUX SHAIKH and others — Petitioners Versus CHIEF MINISTER SINDH and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1998 P L C (C
PAKISTAN ENGINEERING COUNCIL through Registrar, Islamabad and others Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Establishment, Islamabad and others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1998,SCMR811
PAKISTAN ENGINEERING COUNCIL through Registrar, Islamabad and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus ERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Establishment, Islamabad and others‑‑‑Respondents,
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1999 P L C (C
AMIR AHMED Versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION and 4 others
Court: Federal Service Tribunal1999SCMR2122
MUHAMMAD RAFIQ, SUB-ENGINEER — Appellant Versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2003 SCMR 1
MUHAMMAD MUSADAQ KH., ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER and 14 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN RAO and 80 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan