Concern
Concern legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Meaning.
"Concern", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/38981
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Concern"
P L D 1962 (W
MESSRS CHIRAGH DIN-GHULAM MUHAMMAD — Petitioners Versus (1) MESSRS MUHAMMAD RAMZAN, MUHAMMAD ISMAIL, MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM
Court:P L D 1975 Lahore 89
Mst. GHAFOORAN NISA‑Petitioner Versus THE CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, WEST PAKISTAN, LAHORE‑Respondent
Court:2013 C L D 1319
ATHAR AND CO., CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS — Appellant Versus DIRECTOR (ENFORCEMENT), SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN — Respondent
Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan1969 S C M R 114
ABDUL JABBAR‑Petitioner Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, SHEIKHUPURA AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1978 Karachi 328
MESSRs KARACHI INDUSTRIAL AND TEXTILE MILLS, KARACHI AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus SETTET EMENT COMMISSIONER (INDUSTRIES), LAHORE AND ANOTHER ‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑ Art, 199‑Writ jurisdiction‑Scope‑Settlement Commissioner after examining relevant record satisfied as to inclusion of all portions In dispute in premises purchased by respondent in auction ‑Finding being ones of fact, held, could not be reopened at writ stage‑Circum stances appearing on record sustaining such finding, finding even if erroneous, held further, could not be termed as perverse so a9 to need Interference.‑Writ;1981 C L C 913
KARACHI TOOLS & HARDWARE MART‑Appellant Versus NATIONAL MOTORS LTD., KARACHI‑Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1987 Supreme Court 187
MUHAMMAD DIN AND OTHERs‑‑‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1970 Lahore 915
Mian MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH AND ANOTHER‑ — Petitioners Versus THE CHIEF SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITA TION COMMISSIONER, LAHORE AND 5 OTHERS‑ — Respondents
Court:2006 C L D 381
Show-Cause Notice No. EMD/233/499/2002, dated January 18, 2005
Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan1987 S C M R 548
KARACHI INDUSTRIAL AND TEXTILE MILLS Ltd. and another‑‑Appellants Versus THE SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (INDUSTRIES), LAHORE and another‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑Sched., Part IV, para. 15‑‑"Industrial concern"‑‑Definition‑‑View of High Court that inclusive definition of "industrial concern" makes it not exhaustive of properties covered by it and that inclusions themselves indicate an extension in definition rather than precision and restriction, held, appeared to be correct.‑‑Words and phrases.