Home Maxims & Terms New Plea or Ground meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

New Plea or Ground

New Plea or Ground legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2004 CLD 1077 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Person would be precluded from raising, altogether a new plea/ground before Appellate/Revisional Court which had not been raised before lower forum.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "New Plea or Ground", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/38993

Precedents & Case Laws citing "New Plea or Ground"

PTD 2001
Income‑tax Reference No. 65 of 1996, decided on 20th July, 1999.

2001 P T D 974

Smt. ARUNADEVI BAHETI Versus COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX

Court: 241 I T R 622
CLC 1985
Civil Suit No. 360 of 1973, decided on 5th May, 1985.

1985 C L C 2146

St. JOHN AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION (Pakistan) — Plaintiff Versus PAKISTAN RED-CROSS SOCIETY and another — Defendants

Court: Karachi
MLD 1996
Civil Revision No.651 of 1995, decided on 14th January 1996.

1996 M L D 1111

NIZAM DIN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ALI MUHAMMAD and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2001
First Rent Appeal No.699 and Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 1410 of 1998, decided on 24th April, 2000.

2001 C L C 251

SHAUKAT‑Appellant Versus Mst. SHAMAS RAFIQ‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 1989
merits by Supreme Court--Some of respondents dying during pendency of appeal but their estates however sufficiently represented--Plea that appeal had abated and judgment on merits needs to be set aside, untenable

1989 M L D 1518

COLLECTOR OF 24 PARGANAS and others — Petitioners Versus LALITH MOHAN MULLICK and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of India
SCMR 1974
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K‑54 of 1973, decided on 10th September 1973.

1974 S C M R 131

NATIONAL SHIPPING CORPORATION‑Petitioner Versus MESSRS A. R. MUHAMMAD SIDDIK AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1986
Civil Appeals Nos. 4 to 6/P of 1981, decided on 2nd December, 1985.

1986 S C M R 1814

FAZAL RAHMAN‑‑Appellant Versus AMIR HAIDER and another‑‑Respondent

Court: High Court
CLC 1996
Civil Revision No.22 of 1994, decided on 6th June, 1996.

1996 C L C 1920

HOKUM DAD and 4 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. ROQIYYA BEGUM and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Azad J&K
PLD 1963
Criminal Original No. 13 of 1963, decided on 11th March 1963.

P L D 1963 (W

M. ANWAR, BAR-AT-LAW, ADVOCATE-GENERAL, WEST PAKISTAN-Complainant Versus SAADAT KHAYALI, CHIEF EDITOR, PRINTER AND PUBLISHER OF THE

Court: ---S. 500-Defamation-(News paper)-Editor prima facie responsible for defamatory material published in newspaper-To avoid such responsibility, plea of absence of Editor, as well as of absence of knowledge, must be supported by evidence of entrustment of temporary management of newspaper to competent person-Press and Publications Ordinance (XV of 1960), S. 6-Ramasami v. Lokanada I L R 9 Mad. 387 ; Har Swarup v. Muhammad Siraj I L R 50 All. 806 and Muhammad Nazir v. Emperor A I R 1928 All. 321 ref.
SCMR 1984
Civil Petition No. 986 of 1983, decided on 8th February, 1984.

1984 S C M R 1539

GHULAM HAIDER‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD RASHID‑‑Respondent

Court: High Court