Home Maxims & Terms Clerical and Arithmetical Error meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Clerical and Arithmetical Error

Clerical and Arithmetical Error legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2004 CLC 1449 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
"Clerical and arithmetical error"

Connotation.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Clerical and Arithmetical Error", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/39012

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Clerical and Arithmetical Error"

PTD 2018
Appeal No. AT-202 of 2015, decided on 30th January, 2017.

2018 P T D (Trib

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SRB Versus Messrs ELIXIR SECURITIES PAKISTAN (PVT.) LIMITED

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal
PTD 2007
Complaint No. 579-L of 2007, decided on 9th July, 2007.

2007 P T D 2627

Messrs ADAM SUGAR MILLS LTD. through Chief Executive Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
CLC 2004
2004-April-7

2004 C L C 1449

LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Director-General, 7-Egerton Road Lahore and another — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD SALEEM and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2001
2000-March-3

2001 P Cr

IQTIDAR SHAH JAFRI and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PTD 2023
N/A

2023 P T D 430

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE LYALLPUR ZONE, RTO, FAISALABAD Versus Messrs IDEAL SWEETS, BAKERS AND NIMKO FAISALABAD

Court: Lahore High Court
CLC 2006
2006-April-27

2006 C L C 1126

SHAUKAT ISMAIL CHARANIA — Plaintiff Versus Mrs. SHAKEELA HAYAT KHAN and others — Defendants

Court: Karachi
PLD 1978
Constitutional Petition No. 1242 of 1975, decided on 29th March 1978.

P L D 1978 Karachi 691

HASHMAT ALI CHAWLA AND 3 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus DIRECTOR‑GENERAL, EXCISE & TAXATION, KARACHI

Court: ‑‑ S. 10(2)‑Valuation list ‑ Revision of ‑ Jurisdiction ‑ Director General, Excise & Taxation‑Held, could revise valuation list upon proper grounds as provided by law without limit as to time. Jurisdiction:
PLD 1976
Writ Petition No. 1136 of 1964, decided on 7th July 1975.

P L D 1976 Lahore 269

MUHAMMAD SHIBLI KHAN-Petitioner Versus I. U. KHAN, MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE AND ANOTHER -Respundents

Court:
PTD 2019
N/A

2019 P T D 1674

TAYYAB PAPER MILLS Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance, Division, Islamabad and others

Court: Lahore High Court
YLR 2012
Civil Revision No.294-P of 2012, decided on 4th June, 2012.

2012 YLR 2300

MASHOOQ ALI and others — Petitioners Versus MURSALIN SHAH and others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar