Jirga
Jirga legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Jirga, therefore, is not a Parliament and they cannot declare a valid marriage contracted under the provisions of the relevant law as invalid or unlawful.
"Jirga", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/39014
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Jirga"
P L D 2015 Peshawar 187
ABDUL GHAFFAR and 5 others — Petitioners Versus SULTANAT KHAN and 3 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1990 Peshawar 1
GHULAM JAAFAR‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. ZAIBUN NISA and 5 others‑‑Respondents
Court:2004 P Cr
Mst. SHAZIA — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER and others — Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 1965 (W
ABDUL GHAFOOR‑Appellant . Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1962 (W
UMED ALI AND OTHERS-Appellants Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court:P L D 1984 Peshawar 41
Haji JAUDER KHAN AND 5 OTHERS‑‑Petitioners Versus FALAHUDDIN AND 4 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: Ss. 12 & 14‑Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981), Art. 9 Award by Jirga‑Revision‑Evidence brought on record not properly appreciated, by Jirga and Chairman of Jirga endorsing in one line opinion of other members without giving his own views‑Assistant Commissioner exercising powers of Deputy Commissioner only putting his signature on decision written by someone else‑Held, a case relating to huge property dealt with in a superficial manner‑Parties to litigation losing faith in one out (if two Jirga members and application in this respect made before signing of award by members but to no effect‑Order of Additional Secretary Home and Tribal Affairs Depart. merit. remanding case for decision afresh arrived after elaborate discussion and based on material on record‑Such order, held further just and proper and made to secure ends of justice and there having been made no decision on merits no interference called for.‑Evidence1989 C L C 2081
Haji FAIZ MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SAWAT MINGORA
Court: PeshawarPLD 1989 Peshawar 57
Mst. KHAISTA JANA and another — Petitioner Versus Bakas and 3 others — Respondents
Court:P L D 1989 Peshawar 86
TAJ MALOOK Petitioner Versus E. A. C. I, SWAT and 3 others Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑Arts. 2 & 28‑‑Circumstantial evidence‑‑Circumstantial evidence can support case as much as direct evidence if it is substantial.‑ Evidence.P L D 1962 (W
Mst. POPALZAI-Petitioner Versus BAHADUR KHAN AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: