Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Own meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Own

Own legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2002 SCMR 1933 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases'Own'

Defined.

1990 PLD 387 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Word "own"

Meaning.

1989 PTD 1 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words `his own residence', `own' and `occupation'

Connotation.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Own", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3904

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Own"

PTD 2006
Income Tax Appeals Nos.591 and 593 of 2000, decided on 8th June, 2005.

2006 P T D 1508

QAISAR A. MANOO Versus INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 1989
Income-tax Reference No. 14 of 1979, decided on 22nd September, 1988.

1989 P T D 1

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE, KARACHI Versus MUSHTAQ AHMAD

Court: Karachi High Court
CLC 1980
Writ Petition No. 1589 of 1980, heard on 9th March, 1980.

1980 C L C 1434

Ch. ABDUL HAMEED-Petitioner Versus MAJOR MUHAMMAD ARIF, RETURNING OFFICER,

Court: Lahore
PTD 2000
I.T. As. Nos.899/IB to 905/IB of 1998-99, decided on 29th December, 1999.

2000 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2005
Wealth Tax Appeal No.592 of 2000, decided on 8th June, 2005.

2005 P T D 2070

QAISER A. MANOO Versus INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 1993
One view is that if is there are two inconsistent precedents of equal authority the one that is later in time must be followed. The other view is that if the Court giving the later decision did not consider the earlier decision and the Court giving the later decision was not competent to depart from the earlier decision, the earlier decision shall hold the field and that must be followed. The above two views are attracted only when the Court deciding the question is bound by the authority of precedent. Where the Court seized of the matter is of co-ordinate jurisdiction the inconsistent precedents are taken note of and the matter is decided on the' basis of independent scrutiny of the relevant provisions of law.

1993 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2009
I.T.R No. 198 of 2007, decided on 19th February, 2009.

2009 P T D 662

PAKISTAN PETROLEUM LTD., KARACHI Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX APPEALS, ZONE I, KARACHI and another

Court: Karachi High Court
SCMR 1994
Civil Appeal No. 170‑K of 1990, decided on 22nd December, 1991.

1994 S C M R 2255

Hafiz ABDUL HAMEED‑‑‑Appellant Versus NEK MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 1982
Second Appeal from Original Order No. 846 of 1976, decided on 18th April, 1978. .

1982 C L C 1504

MUHAMMAD ASLAM‑Appellant Versus ABDUL JABBAR‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 1987
First Rent Appeal No.577 of 1985, decided on 18th June, 1987.

1987 M L D 3255

Mst.HAJRA BAI — Appellant Versus ABDUL RASHEED TABANI — Respondent

Court: Karachi

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library