Home Maxims & Terms Character meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Character

Character legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2001 CLC 924 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
"Character"

Meaning.

1990 PLD 51 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
"Representative character" and "social status"

Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Character", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3921

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Character"

CLD 2023
2022-September-15

2023 C L D 670

DOLLAR INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED through Authorized Signatory/Director and another — Plaintiffs Versus KAMRAN AKHLAQ — Defendant

Court: Sindh
PLD 2023
2022-September-15

P L D 2023 Sindh 296

DOLLAR INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED through Authorized Signatory/Director and another — Plaintiffs Versus KAMRAN AKHLAQ — Defendant

Court: High Court
SCMR 1976
Civil Appeal No. 8 of 1972, decided on 23rd January 1976.

1976 S C M R 212

THROUGH ITS SECRETARY‑Appellant Versus ALI GUL KHAN AND 4 OTHERS — ‑Respondents

Court: ---Art. 186‑(1)(a)‑‑Public Services Commission, scope of powers of‑‑‑ Functions of Public Services Commission‑‑‑‑Not confined to holding of examinations‑Suitability for appointment to any post‑Cannot be decided without reference to character of candidates‑‑Commission entitled to examine character rolls of candidates to assess suitability of candidates.‑Civil service.
PLC(CS) 1981
Writ Petition No. 1575/S of 1972, decided on 18th June, 1973.

1981 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD ZAMAN KHAN Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 1978
Writ Petition No. 1575/S of 1972, decided on 18th June 1973.

P L D 1978 Lahore 981

MUHAMMAD ZAMAN KHAN-Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB ETC.-Respondents

Court: S. 5 (b)-Advice to Government--Recall of-Commission in its advice to Government considering petitioner fit for appointment and making recommendations accordingly but later recalling such advice on ground of having found him not suitable after perusal of his. character Roll-Character Roll lying with Commission from much before time of making first recommendation, failure of Commission to look into, such document at relevant time no fault of petitioner or Government-First recommendation unconditional and without any reservation with regard to examination of Character Roll-Reason given for recall of earlier recommendation, held, wholly untenable Held further : Note should have been recorded of decision being tentative subject to examination of record of service-No such reservation having been made and service record being already in office of Commission reason given for altering a formal advice duly communicated not tenable.-Civil service.
CLC 1989
Civil Revision Application No.219 of 1981, heard on 18th May, 1987.

1989 C L C 964

Mst. SAKINA and 3 others‑‑Applicants Versus THE EXCISE AND TAXATION OFFICER, 'A' DIVISION, KARACHI

Court: Karachi
PLD 1967
Civil Revision Case No. 122 of 1966, decided on 14th June 1966.

P L D 1967 Dacca 190

BURMAH EASTERN LTD.‑Petitioner Versus BURMAH EASTERN EMPLOYEES' UNION AND OTHERS‑Opposite‑Parties

Court:
SCMR 2004
Civil Appeal No.3128/L, of 2000, decided on 13th May, 2004.

2004 S C M R 1456

MUNIR AHMAD and another — Petitioners Versus DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER/APPELLATE AUTHORITY, SARGODHA and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 1989
Regular Second Appeal No.2 of 1986, decided on 14th November, 1988.

1989 C L C 225

Pir GUL BADSHAH‑‑Appellant Versus Sardar MUHAMMAD NASIR KHAN‑‑Respondent

Court:
CLC 1988
Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 3332 in Suit No.402 of 1987, decided on 12th September, 1987.

1988 C L C 1724

Syed NASIRUDDIN, ADVOCATE and 3 others‑‑Plaintiffs Versus KARACHI BAR ASSOCIATION and 70 others.‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi