Home Maxims & Terms Fresh meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Fresh

Fresh legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2002 CLC 971 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Afresh"Meanings

Word "fresh" pre-fixed with letter "a" grammatically assumes wider dimension to mean "anew", new and recent all respects

2000 CLC 1047 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
"Fresh"

Meaning: new, recent, newly made.

1990 PLD 778 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

"Fresh "?? ?Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Fresh", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3925

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Fresh"

PLD 1969
Criminal Appeals Nos. K‑4 to K‑13 of 1969, decided on 23rl; May 1969.

P L D 1969 Supreme Court 418

MUHAMMAD SADIQ AND 9 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court:
PLC(CS) 1984
Appeal No. GA‑301 of 1983, decided on 19th March, 1984.

1984 P L C 1316

ARSHAD JAVED BUTT Versus MESSRS ITTEHAD CHEMICALS

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
PLC 1989
Appeal No. LHR‑221 of 1987, decided on 3rd October, 1987.

1989 P L C 356

NISAR AHMAD Versus DISTRICT MANAGER, PRTC, LAHORE

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
YLR 2011
Writ Petition No. 10730 of 2010, decided on 27th October, 2010.

2011 Y L R 1444

SHAH MUHAMMAD and 26 others — Petitioners Versus DISTRICT COUNCIL, SARGODHA through Administrate and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC 1986
Petitions Nos. FD‑267 to 269 of 1985/Pb., decided on 7th October, 1985.

1986 P L C 320(2)

Messrs RAFHAN MAIZE PRODUCTS CO., FAISALABAD Versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and 2 others

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
MLD 1991
1990-December-8

1991 M LD 571

MUHAMMAD BAKHSH — Petitioner, Versus ABID HUSSAIN SHAH and 6 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLD 1989
Writ Petition No. 539 of 1987, decided on 6th December, 1988.

P L D 1989 Peshawar 86

TAJ MALOOK Petitioner Versus E. A. C. I, SWAT and 3 others Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑Arts. 2 & 28‑‑Circumstantial evidence‑‑Circumstantial evidence can support case as much as direct evidence if it is substantial.‑ Evidence.
MLD 2015
N/A

2015 M L D 1459

Khawaja BASHIR AHMED AND SONS (PVT.) LTD., MULTAN — Petitioner Versus Messrs MARTRADE SHIPPING AND TRANSPORT, GmbH through Brokers/Local Agents and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC 1986
Appeal No. FD-403 of 1985, decided on 30th October, 1985.

1986 P L C 457

KOHINOOR TEXTILE MILLS Versus SHAH MUHAMMAD

Court: High Court
PLC 1997
Appeals Nos. KAR‑35 and KAR‑62, decided on 27th March, 1996.

1997 P L C 116

PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION (PRIVATE) LIMITED through Incharge Law Department and others Versus Shaikh NISAR AHMAD RAHI and others

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh