Horse-trading
Horse-trading legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
The word "horse-trading" is nowhere defined. But in common parlance with reference to political games it is understood as winning of the support of members of Legislative Assemblies belonging to opposing camps by inducement and corrupt means.
"Horse-trading", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3927
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Horse-trading"
P L D 1997 Peshawar 93
AFTAB AHMAD KHAN SHERPAO‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Sardar FAROOQ AHMAD KHAN LEGHARI and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court:1993 M L D 1575
NISAR AHMED KHUHRO‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Syed QABOOL MUHAMMAD SHAH and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 1992 Supreme Court 646
Khawaja AHMAD TARIQ RAHIM — Petitioner Versus THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Parliamentary Affairs,
Court: High Court1993 M L D 1127
Syed QAIM ALI SHAH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ATTA MUHAMMAD MURRI and 6 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: KarachiSIDH HIGH COURT
KHALID MALIK and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑‑Arts. 58(2)(b) & 199‑‑‑Dissolution of National Assembly by the President‑‑ While exercising power under Art.58(2)(b) President has to first form opinion objectively with regard to preconditions mentioned in Art.58(2)(b) of the Constitution‑‑‑President, after having formed such an opinion, is free to exercise his discretion one way or the other, namely, either to dissolve the Assembly or refuse to dissolve it‑‑‑Whether process of opinion forming by the President is objective one‑‑‑Test‑‑‑While discretion so vested in the President under Art.58(2)(b) of the Constitution may not be controlled by the superior Courts in exercise of the power of judicial review, the process of opinion forming by the President in such a case, is subject to the powers of judicial review enjoyed by the superior Courts under the Constitution‑‑‑Role of Courts while exercising powers of judicial review in such cases stated.‑‑Judicial review.P L D 2018 Supreme Court 97
SARDAR SHER BAHADAR KHAN and others — Appellants/Petitioners Versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Election Commission, Islamabad and others — Respondents
Court: (c) Election Commission Order Chief Executive's Order 1 of 2002 ---P L D 1975 Karachi 260
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-Appellant Versus MESSRS NEW CHINA GLASSWARE Co-Respondent
Court:P L D 1992 Supreme Court 723
Affairs, Islamabad and others — Appellants Versus AFTAB AHMAD KHAN SHERPAO and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1986 M L D 1666
D VAUGHAN RACKLIN‑‑Appellant Versus AR OF TRADE MARKS, KARACHI Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 2000 Supreme Court 77
Mohtarma BENAZIR BHUTTO ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN and 2 others ‑‑‑Respondents
Court: