Cannot
Cannot legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
The word "horse-trading" is nowhere defined. But in common parlance with reference to political games it is understood as winning of the support of members of Legislative Assemblies belonging to opposing camps by inducement and corrupt means.
"Cannot", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3929
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Cannot"
2023 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD YASIN and another Versus The DIRECTOR GENERAL, PAKISTAN POST OFFICE, ISLAMABAD and another
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2003 P L C (C
HABIB-UR-REHMAN Versus REGIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL REGION, MULTAN and 4 others
Court: Lahore High CourtP L D 1984 Lahore 103
Ch. ABDUL QADIR‑Appellants Versus THE ELECTION TRIBUNAL AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: S. 13‑Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 19811, Art. 9‑Interim injunction ‑ Allegations regarding malpractices, corrupt practices and violation of Election Rules cannot be established without production of evidence‑Assertion that record should have been examined before disposing of application for interim injunction, amounts to conceding fact that recording of evidence was necessary. Held, it cannot be urged in circumstances that petitioner was able to make out a prima facie case.‑Injunction.P L D 1972 Lahore 780
MUHAMMAD SADIQ AND 15 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF AUQAF, WEST PAKISTAN, LAHORE AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court:2023 S C M R 394
MUHAMMAD YASIN and another — Petitioners Versus The DIRECTOR GENERAL, PAKISTAN POST OFFICE, ISLAMABAD and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2000 P T D 943
K.V.REDDY and another Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and another
Court: 232 I T R 306P L D 1976 Lahore 1095
BASHIR HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus Sh. MUHAMMAD SAEED AND 2 OTHER-spondents
Court: ‑‑ Ss. 15(4) read with S. 13(3)(ii), (5‑B)‑Finding of fact about bona' fide requirement‑Cannot be set aside or interfered with by High Court in second appeal‑Such finding of fact arrived at without taking into consideration provisions of S. 13(3)(it) & (5‑B)‑Held, cannot bind High Court.‑Appeal (civil).2025 C L C 1836
SARFARAZ KHAN KHILJI — Applicant Versus PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO CHIEF MINISTER BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Balochistan1989 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan2004 M L D 69
Mst. SHABNAM‑‑‑Petitioner Versus LIAQAT ALI and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Peshawar