Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Attempt meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Attempt

Attempt legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2004 CLC 1080 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
"Attempt"

Definition of.

1991 PLD 705 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
"Attempt"

Meaning in legal parlance.

1990 MLD 184 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Attempt"

Meaning and connotation.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Attempt", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3934

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Attempt"

PLD 1950
Criminal Appeal No. 28 of 1948, decided, on 5th April, 1948, from the order of Sessions judge, 'Lahore' dated 23rd December, 1947.

P

ASHAQ HUSSAIN‑Convict‑Appellant Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1952
1950-October-5

PLD 1952 Sind 28

CROWN Versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE SAFDAR, and others -Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 1991
1991-May-16

1991 M L D 1823

ABDUL GHAFFAR KHAN — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
SCMR 2008
Criminal Appeal No.259 of 2001, decided on 9th April, 2008.

2008 S C M R 1636

SULTAN MUHAMMAD alias BACHA KHAN — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1955
Criminal Appeal No. 513 of 1953 decided on 11th February 1955 from the order of Fazl‑i‑Haq, Sessions Judge, Attock at Campbellpur, dated the 14th February, 1953, setting aside the order of Muhammad Latif Malik, Magistrate 1st Class, Campbellpur, dated the 31st December, 1952 and acquitting the accused respondents,

P L D 1955 Lahore 430

THE CROWN‑ — Appellant Versus NASEER AHMAD and another‑Accused‑ — Respondents

Court:
PLD 1991
1991-May-21

P L D 1991 Federal Shariat Court 268

ARSHAD MAHMOOD — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: High Court
MLD 1990
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2575/B of 1989, decided on 23rd August, 1989.

1990 M L D 184

ABDUR RAZZAQ‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1986
Civil Appeal No. 31‑P of 1984, decided on 21st January, 1986. (On appeal from the judgment of the Peshawar High Court, dated 19‑6‑1984, in W. P. No. 368 of 1983).

P L D 1986 Supreme Court 192

CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus KHAN MUHAMMAD‑Respondent

Court: ‑‑ Ss. 2 (5) & 156 (8)‑"Smuggle" and "attempt to smuggle"-- Definition‑Attempt to smuggle though not defined in Act but S. 156 (8) makes attempt to smuggle also punishable‑Attempt does not make it necessary that interruption which aborts consummation of crime should be penultimate act for completion of crime‑Course of conduct of a culprit from stage of conception to consummation of crime analysed.‑‑Words and phrases.
CLC 2004
N/A

2004 C L C 1080

FATIMA-TUZ-ZAHRA — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT COLLGE UNIVERSITY, LAHORE and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1996
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1845/B of 1995, decided on 21st January, 1996

1996 M L D 878

LIAQAT and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library