Home Maxims & Terms Surcharge meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Surcharge

Surcharge legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2001 PLD 1 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Surcharge "

Meaning.

1997 SCMR 641 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesSurcharge" or "charge"

Connotation. Mere nomenclature is not a decisive factor in determining the nature and meaning of surcharge or charge. The Court must look to the attending factors and circumstances of the case, the reality involved in it, the conduct of parties, the manner and object of levy and then decide what in effect is this levy.

1991 PLD 329 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
"Surcharge"

Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Surcharge", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3937

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Surcharge"

PTD 2006
Complaint No. 538-L of 2005, decided on 19th July, 2005.

2006 P T D 1906

Messrs AKRAM INDUSTRIES LIMITED through Authorized Attorney Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
PLD 2008
2004-May-28

P L D 2008 Karachi 221

Syeda WAQUAR JAHAN NADEEM through her Son — Petitioner Versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION, KARACHI through Managing Director and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PTD 2005
N/A

2005 P T D 2392

Messrs PAK-ARAB REFINERY LTD., MUZAFFARGARH Versus SUPERINTENDENT, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE, MUZAFFARGARH and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 2016
2015-May-29

P L D 2016 Lahore 35

FLYING CEMENT COMPANY — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PTD 2015
I.C.A. No.1068 of 2014, decided on 29th May, 2015.

2015 P T D 1945

FLYING CEMENT COMPANY Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 1991
Income Tax Reference No. 67 of 1983, decided on 19th February, 1991

1991 P T D 680

THE. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL `B', KARACHI Versus Messrs EVENS MEDICAL LTD., KARACHI

Court: Karachi High Court
PTD 2008
Review Application No.58 of 2005 in C.No.538-L of 2005, decided on 24th November, 2005.

2008 P T D 1349

Messrs AKRAM INDUSTRIES LIMITED Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
PTD 2002
Complaint No. C-1373-K of 2001, decided on 23rd January, 2002.

2002 P T D 2245

Messrs SIDDIQSONS WEAVING MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACH Versus SECRETARY. REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
CLC 2014
2013-September-12

2014 C L C 197

PAKISTAN BROADCASTERS ASSOCATION through Executive Director and 7 others — Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY through Chairman and another — Respondents

Court: Sindh
MLD 1989
Writ Petition No.5122 of 1988, decided on 4th April, 1989.

1989 M L D 4479

Messrs TAJ TEXTILE MILLS LTD.‑ — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore