Return on capital paid
Return on capital paid legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Word `return' is generally understood as profit in the nature of dividend and not in the nature of interest and/or obligatory charge.
Word return' is generally understood as profit in the nature of dividend and not in the nature of interest and/or obligatory charge.
"Return on capital paid", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3938
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Return on capital paid"
1991 P T D 488
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PESHAWAR ZONE, PESHAWAR Versus Messrs SIEMEN A.G.
Court: ---- Contract---Contracting parties were bound to fulfil their contracts and they would remain liable for any contraventions both here and hereafter.---Contract.P D 1991 Supreme Court 368
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, PESHAWAR ZONE, PESHAWAR ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus Messrs SIEMEN A.G.‑‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑‑ So long as the existing statutes were not brought in conformity with the Injunctions of Islam Art.227 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) their interpretation, application and enforcement, wherein discretionary judicial elements were involved, only that course would be adopted which was in accord with the Islamic philosophy, its common law and jurisprudence.1982 P T D 354
SIEMENS A. G. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, RAWALPINDI ZONE
Court: Peshawar High CourtP L D 1982 Peshawar 159
SIEMENS A. G.‑Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, RAWALPINDI-ZONE‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑ S. 2(6‑A)‑Words and phrases‑Word "dividend"‑Means a share' of profits, whether at a fixed rate or otherwise; allocated to holders . of shares in a company‑Term generally used with reference to trading or other companies and to payments made to members of company as such and not by way of remuneration for services.‑Words and phrases.1988 M L D 1408
BANKERS EQUITY Ltd. — Petitioner Versus GENERAL PUBLIC — Respondent
Court: Lahore1970 P L C 41 (2)
MESSRS THE INDUSTRIAL GRINDING LTD., KARACHI Versus FIVE ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES OF THE WORKMEN or INDUSTRIAL
Court: Industrial Appellate Tribunal West Pakistan2010 C L D 135
RECKITT BENCKISER PAKISTAN LTD. — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES — Objector
Court: Karachi1989 M L D 3075
Court: Karachi
1988 M L D 1565
JALIL AHMAD SIDDIOI‑‑Plaintiff Versus SALIM ANWAR alias Salim Hassan‑‑Defendant
Court: Karachi1988 P T D 200
Messrs UNITED LINER AGENCIES OF PAK. LTD., KARACHI Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KARACHI
Court: Karachi High Court