Continuous
Continuous legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Meaning.
"Continuous", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3956
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Continuous"
2023 S C M R 1573
JALLA and another — Appellants Versus SHELL INTERNATIONAL TRADING AND SHIPPING CO. LTD. and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of UK*P L D 1967 Dacca 581
AMANULLAH MOLLA‑Petitioner Versus DACCA MUNICIPALITY‑Opposite‑Party
Court:2005 C L D 503
Mrs. TANIS AKHTAR ‑‑‑Appellant Versus AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN, through Manager and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1988 P T D 841
MAYA RANI PUNJ Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI
Court: Supreme Court (India)P L D 1958 Dacca 8
AZIZAN NESSA KHATOON‑Appellant Versus ABUL HUSSAIN BHUIYA and others‑Respondents.
Court:P L D 1983 Karachi 497
MUHAMMAD SALIM AND 6 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus BAKHSHAL.. KHAN AND ANOTHER — Respondents
Court: S. 13-Notification issued on 30th October, 1963 published in Gazette of West Pakistan, Extraordinary, dated 6th November, 1963 (which . was in continuation of Notification dated 12th March, 1959 published ' in Gazette of West Pakistan, Extraordinary dated 16th March, 1959) investing powers of Rent Controller .to all IIIrd Class Civil Judges and subordinate Judges in West Pakistan except Quetta and Kalat Divisions, held, not specifically superseded (in view of Notification dated 15th July, 1964, published in Gazette of West Pakistan, Extraordinary, dated 30th July, 1964 which was issued in continuation of Notification dated 30th October, 1963)-Words "in continuation" -Connotation Ghulam Sarwar v. Ghulam Muhammad Mithal 1983 . C L C 480 overruled.-Words and phrases.1987 P T D 207
Smt. MAYA RANI PUNJ Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI
Court: Supreme Court (India)1986 P Cr
AURANGZEB‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Special Court of Offences in BanksP L D 1966 Azad J & K 15
Syed LALL SHAH ETC.‑Appellants Versus AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR GOVERNMENT — Respondent
Court:P L D 1963 Dacca 92
AMIR KHAN — ‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑ — Opposite‑Party
Court: Case‑law referred to.