Home Maxims & Terms Status meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Status

Status legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1997 PLD 32 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases "Status"

Definition.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Status", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3969

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Status"

PLD 1993
Civil Appeal No.1017 of 1990, decided on 22nd November, 1992.

P L D 1993 Supreme Court 52

GHULAM RASOOL and another ‑‑‑ Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD LATIF and 2 others ‑‑‑ Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑‑ S. 21‑A added by Punjab Pre‑emption (Amendment) Act (I of 1944)‑‑ Improvement, otherwise than through inheritance or succession made in the status of a vendee after institution of suit for pre‑emption ‑‑‑ Effect ‑‑‑ Section ZI‑A, Punjab Pre‑emption Act, 1913 was added to restore "status quo" in case of pre‑emption suits wherein vendee sought to improve his position by means of a "voluntary acquisition" of right of property made after the institution of suit ‑‑‑ Words "status quo" and "voluntary acquisition"‑‑‑Connotation‑‑‑"Status quo" would imply fixing the status of vendee as on the date of institution of suit‑‑‑"Voluntary acquisition" of right of property by vendee after the institution of suit ‑‑‑ Riddance of a disqualification or a disability amounted to change in the status quo, an improvement in status ‑‑‑ Word "status" in the context of pre emption law means position or locus standi to pre‑empt a sale, to compete with pre‑emptor or to defeat the rights of a pre‑emptor ‑‑‑ Word "status" being pervasive in scope would cover and include even shedding off a disability.
MLD 1998
N/A

1998 M L D 696

SIRAJ DIN and another — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD AKBAR and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 2007
2007-February-20

2007 M L D 844

Raja MUHAMMAD RIAZ — Petitioner Versus AKBER — Respondent

Court: Peshawar
SCMR 2005
Civil Appeal No.1856 of 2001, decided on 27th June, 2005.

2005 S C M R 1440

Syed BAQAT BUKHARI and others — Appellants Versus ELLAHI BAKHSH and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2004
Civil Appeal No.66 of 2002, decided on 27th March, 2004.

P L D 2004 Azad J&K 17

AQAL HUSSAIN‑‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN‑‑‑Respondent

Court:
MLD 1989
Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 4673 of 1987 in Civil Appeal No. 4521 of 1986, decided on 10th November, 1987.

1989 M L D 2405

Messrs BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD. — Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (India)
CLC 1983
Civil Revision No. 295 of 1981, decided on 6th July, 1981.

1983 C L C 3033

MAHMOODULLAH KHAN‑Appellant Versus Mst. KANIZ FATIMA SHAIFTA ‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PTD 1998
Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 306 of 1991, decided on 11th March, 1996.

1998 P T D 3283

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus SOBHAGMAL MISHRILAL SEMLAVADA

Court: 223 I T R 554
PTD 2013
I.T.As. Nos.1103 and 1105 of 2012, decided on 11th October, 2012.

2013 P T D (Trib

Messrs RAMZAN STEEL INDUSTRIES, Proprietor Khalid Mahmood, Gujranwala Versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), R.T.O., GUJRANWALA

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan
PTD 2012
I.T.A. No.749/LB of 2012, decided on 28th June, 2012.

2012 P T D (Trib

ISLAMABAD STEEL FURNACE, GUJRANWALA Versus C.I.R., R.T.O., GUJRANWALA

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan