Home Maxims & Terms Approval meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Approval

Approval legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1999 PLD 350 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases Word "approval"

Meaning.

1998 PLC(CS) 1450 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesWord "approval"

Meaning.

1998 SCMR 2013 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 12Police Rules, 1934, R. 1.2Standing Order 11 of 1987Power of Inspector-General to make rulesSuch power of Inspector-General is subject to the "approval" of the Provincial GovernmentWord "approval" occurring in S. 12, Police Act, 1861Connotation

Merely because a Standing Order issued by the Inspector-General has held the ground for a number of years is not sufficient to assume the grant of "approval" of the issuance of the Standing Order by the Provincial Government

Standing Order 11 of 1987 issued by Inspector-General of Police having not been approved by the Provincial Government is devoid of its legal status and is, therefore, of no legal authority

Fact that Standing Order II of 1987 was issued with a view to bring about "efficiency and honesty" in the police force by itself, would not absolve the Inspector-General from getting approval of the Provincial Government.

[Words and phrases]

1997 PLD 93 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
"Approval"

Meaning.

1989 PTD 181 INCOME-TAX-APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
Words `approval' and `specifying'

Connotation of.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Approval", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3979

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Approval"

PCRLJ 1981
Criminal Revision No. 10 of 1981, decided on 30thJune, 1981.

1981 P Cr

MANZOOR AHMED — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN AND 2 OTHERS — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court AJ&K
PLD 1968
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3305 of 1967, decided on 8th March 1968.

P L D 1968 Lahore 1030

REHMAT MASIH‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑.Respondent

Court:
PTD 1986
I . T . A . No. 213 of 1978‑79, decided on 29th April, 1986.

1986 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income‑tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PLD 1958
Criminal App: al No. 8 of 1958, decided on 16th April, 1958. (On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistani Lahore, dated the 18th April 1957, in Criminal Appeal No. 526 of 1956):

P L D 1958 Supreme Court (Pak

RAFIQ AR N1A D‑ Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court:
SCMR 1969
Criminal Appeal No. 9 of 1954, decided on 31st May 1954.

1969SCMR 907

TAJA‑Appellant Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 1970
Criminal Appeal No. 9 of 1954, decided on 31st May 1954.

1970 P Cr

TAJA‑Appellant Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court
PLD 1975
Criminal Bail Application No. 883 of 1973, decided on 17th June 1974,

P L D 1975 Karachi 159

ABDUL LATIF-Applicant Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: -- Ss. 337 & 561-A-Approver-Bail-Approver's detention in custody till termination of trial-Such strict principle not laid down by S. 337-Continued detention of approver may for variety of reasons be sometimes unjustified or even harsh-Bar under Ss. 337(3), Cr. P. C. ­Not absolute-Bail may be granted to approver under S. 561-A, Cr. P. C. in case of hardship bordering on injustice- Mohamed Abdul Majid v. Emperor A I R 1927 Sind 173 dissented from.
CLD 2022
2021-June-22

2022 C L D 184

AYAZ AHMAD MALIK and 4 others — Appellants Versus ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Director General and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Punjab Environmental Tribunal
CLC 2016
N/A

2016 C L C 210

Messrs AL-SAFA GOLDEN CO. (PVT.) LIMITED — Petitioner Versus CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Chairman and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
YLR 1999
Suit No. 127 and Civil Miscellaneous Application No.909 of 1998, decided on 12th October, 1998.

1999 Y L R 1823

Messrs PEACE DEVELOPERS through Managing Partner‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION through Administrator and 7 others‑‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi