Shall
Shall legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Meaning and import.
Ordinarily the word "shall" is construed as couching a mandatory provision, but very often the words "shall" and "may" connote interchangeable concepts.
Interchangeability.
As a general rule word "may" gave impression of its being enabling directory or discretionary power, while words "shall" and "must" gave impression of their being imperative, obligatory and mandatory but same were not tied up with hard and fast rule of being discretionary or imperative
Said words could be used interchangeably
Circumstances and fact of each case would determine interchangeability or convertability of words "may" for "shall" or "must" and vice versa
With change in circumstances, meanings and force of law also changed
Word "shall" under some circumstances, could not be treated and read as of mandatory connotation while same word from same law could be treated as of mandatory nature, if circumstances changed and requirement of time so warranted
Courts had to keep in view circumstances of each case while interpreting a word used in a legal instrument
Courts had not to be oblivious of ground realities.
Word "shall" used with reference to procedure for appointment or promotion, would signify that procedure prescribed in relevant rules had to be followed for appointment by promotion.
Word "shall" used with reference to procedure for appointment or promotion, would signify that procedure prescribed in relevant rules had to be followed for appointment by promotion.
Words "may" and "shall" are interchangeable.
Meaning.
"Shall" when appears in a statute "is used as a term of art to impose a duty to do what is prescribed, not a discretion to do it or not according to whether it is reasonably practicable to do it or to do something like it instead"
Test.
......Shall" and "may" are interchangeable depending on the nature of a particular provision in which the word has been used.
Word 'shall' as used in S.3 of Act VI of 1937??Meaning, scope and import of??Word "shall" in the context cf S.3 of the Act, would convey meaning of the word "may", thereby investing Court with discretion to order staying of proceedings before an arbitrator?Courts would always lean to interpretation of a provision of a statute which could preserve jurisdiction of the Court instead of its ouster.?? [Interpretation of statutes].
The words "may" and 'shall' are interchangeable, dependent on the context.
Sind Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979), S.5.
Words "may", "shall" and "must"-Connotation-Intent of Legislature-Held, guiding factor-Interpretation of statutes.
"May", "must", "shall"-Interpretation-"May" in ordinary usage permissive and "must" imperative-Words "may" and "shall"-Interchangeable in legal phraseology depending on context in which used and not to be interpreted with rigidity attributed to them in ordinary parlance.-[Interpretation of statutes].
Word "shall" employed in statute Meaning.
Interpretation of statutes-Words "may" and "shall"-Interchangeable, depending on context to which they are used.
"Shall"-Whether directory or mandatory-Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 63, 69 (2), 96 (1), 102 (2), 1,24, 190 and 191 (6)
Word "shall" directory (obiter).
"Shall", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3994
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Shall"
2020 S C M R 2122
N/A
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1989SCMR139
N/A
Court: High CourtP L D 2019 Supreme Court 357
CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY and others — Petitioners Versus SUPREME APPELLATE COURT GILGIT-BALTISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1984 P Cr
GHULAM SARWAR and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore2018 S C M R 1991
Mst. MADIHA YOUNUS — Petitioner Versus IMRAN AHMED — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2005 Karachi 591
QAMAR UL ISLAM and another — Petitioners Versus DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE/CHAIRMAN ELECTION TRIBUNAL, NAWABSHAH and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1999 Y L R 2297
SULTAN MAHMOOD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, LODHRAN‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2020 S C M R 111
ABDUL KARIM — Petitioner Versus NASIR SALIM BAIG and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2022 Lahore 224
Qari MUHAMMAD ATTA ULLAH — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, SIALKOT and another — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2021 Lahore 605
GHULAM YASIN BHATTI — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE, PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS AND HUMAN RIGHTS, ISLAMABAD and another — Respondents
Court: High Court