Life
Life legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Duty of the State is to see that the life of a person is protected as to enable him to enjoy it within the prescribed limits of law
Pollution, environmental degradation and impure food items also fall in the category of deprivation of life.
"Life", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/41015
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Life"
P L D 1980 Karachi 164
Mst. MAI DHAYANI-Petitioner Versus THE HOME SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SIND, KARACHI AND ANOTHER-Respondents Constitutional Petitions Nos. D-20 and D-61 of 1.979, decided on 11th March; 1979.
Court: S. 57 as amended by Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972)Retrospectivity of statutes-Law Reforms Ordinance-Not retrospective in operation-No sentence of "imprisonment for life" could be awarded in respect of offences committed before coming into force of Law Reforms Ordinance-Nor can a sentence of transportation for life awarded before enforcement of Ordinance be construed as a sentence of "imprisonment for life" as defined in amended S. 57 of Penal Code.-Interpretation of statutes.1978 S C M R 292
ABDUL REHMAN-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: ----O. XXVI-Review--Petition for review barred by 1119 days Mistake, however, apparent, on face of record and petitioner, an illiterate man, in jail all through--Delay in filing review petition con doned in circumstances.--Review----Condonation of delay.1968 P T D 356
NEPTUNE ASSURANCE Co. LTD. Versus LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
Court: Supreme Court IndiaP L D 1982 Quetta 94
STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN Appellant Versus K. A. MARKER AND another‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1983 Lahore 420
MUHAMMAD AMIR ADVOCATE-Petitioner Versus ALI KHAN AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: Art. 9-Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), S. 3(i)-Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302 & 54-Commutation of death sentence. Imposition of penalty greater than one prescribed for offence at time offence committed, held, not legal-Any increase in possible penalty, held, violation of ex post facto clause regardless of length of sentence actually imposed-Law changing punishment and inflicting greater punishment than law annexed to crime or offence when committed or imposed new punishment in addition to one prescribed, held, ex post facto, and, therefore, unconstitutional.-Sentence-Interpretation of statutes.2014 S C M R 655
Mst. NASEEM BEGUM and others — Appellants Versus STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1968 Lahore 1
MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN AND 5 OTHERS Convict‑-Petitioners Versus THE STATE THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAIL,
Court: High Court2016 C L C 906
ALI STEEL INDUSTRY through Proprietor — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Chief Secretary and another — Respondents
Court: Peshawar2016 C L D 569
ALI STEEL INDUSTRY through Proprietor — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Chief Secretary and another — Respondents
Court: Peshawar2000 C L C 633
QAMARUDDIN SOOMRO‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ADMINISTRATOR, MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE,
Court: Karachi