Public Trust, doctrine of
Public Trust, doctrine of legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Cases from foreign jurisdictions wherein doctrine of public trust was applied for preservation of the environment and protection of environmental rights of citizens mentioned.
Concept of sustainable development comprised of four legal elements; first, the need to preserve natural resources for the benefit of future generations (the principle of inter-generational equity); second, the aim of exploiting natural resources in a manner which was 'sustainable', or 'prudent', or 'rational', or 'wise', or 'appropriate' (the principle of sustainable use); third, the 'equitable' use of natural resources, which implied that use by one State must take account of the needs of other States (the principle of equitable use, or inter-generational equity), and, fourth, the need to ensure that environmental considerations were integrated into economic and other development plans, programmes and projects, and that development needs were taken into account in applying the environmental objectives (the principle of integration)
Link between basal view of sustainable development and the Public trust doctrine was through the latter's protection of resources for future generations of trust beneficiaries
By mandating the governmental trustees to treat the interests of current and future citizens equally, the notion of intergenerational equity was inherent to the Public trust doctrine.
Public trust doctrine implied that certain properties such as air, running water, the sea and the sea shores were common property shared by all the citizens
Title to such essential resources vested in the State in trust for the benefit of the general public
State was thus bound to protect them for their uninterrupted use
Public trust doctrine involved three elements: a trustee, a beneficiary and trust property
Natural resources were trust property; government was their trustee and must manage them subject to fiduciary duties for the benefit of both present and future generations who were the beneficiaries of th e public trust.
Green belt around both sides of the canal is a public trust resource and cannot be converted into private or any other use other than public purpose
Widening of the road is a public purpose and a minimum area is being affected and the remaining green belt/public park is much larger
Said public park has been recommended by the Mediation Committee to be declared as Heritage Park and recommendations of the Committee have been accepted by the Provincial Government in totality
Doctrine of Public Trust, in circumstances, cannot be said to have been compromised.
" Doctrine of Public Trust" as developed during the days of ancient Roman Empire, enjoins upon the Government to protect the resources for the enjoyment of the general public rather than to permit their use for private ownership or commercial purposes
Even under the Islamic law certain water resources are to be protected from misuse and over exploitation.
"Public Trust, doctrine of", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/41476
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Public Trust, doctrine of"
2005 C L C 424
SINDH INSTITUTE OF UROLOGY AND TRANSPLANTATION and others‑‑‑Plaintiffs Versus NESTLE MILKPAK LIMITED and others‑‑‑Defendants
Court: KarachiP L D 2015 Lahore 112
YOUNG DOCTORS ASSOCIATION and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2014 C L D 1133
YOUNG DOCTORS ASSOCIATION and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2019 Sindh 697
GULZAR AHMED — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary and 19 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2015 S C M R 1520
LAHORE BACHAO TEHRIK — Petitioner Versus Dr. IQBAL MUHAMMAD CHAUHAN and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2020 Lahore 137
Mian MUHAMMAD ASIF — Petitioner Versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE and others — Respodents
Court: High Court2013 M L D 640
KANDAWALLA TRUST through Trustees and another — Petitioners Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Sindh2025 C L C 2020
IBRAR HUSSAIN and 2 others — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (GENERAL) ISLAMABAD and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Islamabad2001 P T D 1215
TRUSTEES OF H.E.H. THE NIZAM'S PILGRIMAGE MONEY TRUST Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX
Court: 243 1 T R 676P L D 2012 Balochistan 31
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY QUETTA BALOCHISTAN through Deputy Secretary — Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL QUETTA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORYT and others — Respondents
Court: High Court