DeLimitation
DeLimitation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioners were aggrieved of Preliminary Delimitation Scheme for Constituencies of National and Provincial Assemblies elections
Validity
Petitioners did not point out any violation of the provision of Ss. 19, 20 & 21 of Elections Act, 2017 or Election Rules, 2017, to create any exception calling for interference of High Court by invoking Constitutional jurisdiction
Population census was to be carried out from time to time merely because fresh census was underway and no results had been gathered till then
This could not be a ground for stalling process of delimitations
Fair elections would mean fair representation and delimitation of constituencies was a foundational step towards that end
Election Commission had properly appreciated pros and cons including fundamentals of delimitation with assistance of Delimitation Committee
High Court declined to interfere in Preliminary Delimitation Scheme for Constituencies of National and Provincial Assemblies elections
Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.
Delimitation is a vital and indispensable milestone in electoral process as it defines and fashions strength and weight of a vote
Fair and transparent delimitation of constituencies is pivotal for holding honest, fair and just elections
Central focus of any fair and just electoral system is to ensure that right to vote is properly guarded against scourge of vote dilution or discrimination during process of delimitation
Any electoral system must, therefore, be designed to protect right to vote
Any step or stage in process which has bearing on the right to vote is an indispensable part of electoral process
Delimitation, means demarcation of boundaries of electoral constituency in order to ensure fair, just and proportional representation of people in elections
Basic object of delimitation is to secure, so far as practicable, equal representation for equal segments of population in legislative bodies
Delimitation is usually done with regard to stated constraints of administrative convenience, contiguity, geographical, and communication factors; and unstated influences of party-political advantage
Principles of delimitation include having regard to distribution of population in geographically compact areas, existing boundaries of administrative units, facilities of communication and public convenience and other cogent factors to ensure homogeneity in creation of constituencies
Other equally important aim of delimitation is to divide geographic areas into territorial constituencies so fairly that no party or candidate may legitimately have grievance that there has been "gerrymandering" of constituencies in favour of or against interests of any particular party or candidate
Right to cast a ballot is meaningless if ballot is undervalued relative to a ballot cast by a voter in a less populated district
Gerrymandering is "drawing of district boundaries so as to favour one's own chances in future elections
Strategies for gerrymandering have been characterized as 'stacking', 'packing', and 'cracking', each of which seeks to minimize influence of those likely to vote for opponents"
Process of delimitation has to ensure that voting equality is not disturbed and vote of one citizen must in no manner be less than vote of another citizen
Other than population parity, geographical compactness, homogeneity of interest of community need to be factored in setting parameters of delimitation
Delimitation is not a mere drawing of boundaries with a stroke of pen
Delimitation is a judicious exercise of delineating electoral areas, vigilantly guarding against any possible fear of vote dilution, disenfranchisement or corrupt practices
Unfair or partisan delineation can lead to skewed results, tarnishing electoral integrity
Foundations or rules of game for a fair and just election are laid down at the time of delimitation of constituencies
Delimitation must be a neutral exercise, conducted by a neutral body
Any partisan political intervention and drawing up of political constituencies under dictates of political party in power is bound to lead to gerrymandering and unjust political windfall, tarnishing sanctity of elections and crippling faith of an ordinary man in the system of democracy.
Population variation was well within the 10% threshold which was to be complied with pursuant to S.20 of Elections Act, 2017
Rule 10(5), Election Rules, 2017 began with the words "as far as possible..."
Election Commission of Pakistan, therefore, could not possibly delimit each constituency by strict adherence to the Rule
Certain amount of leeway had been given by the legislature in that behalf
Election Commission of Pakistan had, therefore, had duly complied with the provisions of R.10(5) of the Election Rules, 2017
No mala fide or ulterior motive on the part of the Commission was shown
Constitutional petition was dismissed.
Constitutional vision of institutionalized participation of people at the local level, extensively discussed.
Notification of undoing an electoral ward so as to result in the removal of the existing incumbents from their elected offices
Removal of Zila Nazim and Naib Nazim from their respective posts would attract the specific provision of Sindh Local Government Ordinance, 2001
By virtue of S.7 of the Ordinance a protection and safeguard provided for and regulated by the specific sections of the Ordinance cannot be taken away in an indirect manner by assumption of implied powers
Language, intention and policy of the Legislature having been made manifestly clear the question of resorting to provisions of S.186(2), Sindh Local Government Ordinance, 2001, does not arise
Elected Governments of the Unions and Taluka being in existence, there is no reason to appoint a public officer to exercise the powers of the elected Nazims.
Definition.
"DeLimitation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/41610
Precedents & Case Laws citing "DeLimitation"
1984 C L C 2198
MUHAMMAD SHARIF‑ — Petitioner Versus PUNJAB ELECTION AUTHORITY AND OTHERS‑ — Respondents
Court: Lahore2014 Y L R 1583
GHULAM MUSTAFA and 5 others — Petitioners Versus COMMISSIONER/DELIMITATION AUTHORITY, D.G. KHAN DIVISION, DERA GHAZI KHAN and 5 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1984 C L C 153
Malik JAVID AKBAR — ‑Petitioner Versus PUNJAB LOCAL COUNCILS ELECTION AUTHORITY AND
Court: Lahore2016 C L C 871
GHULAM FAREED — Petitioner Versus DELIMITATION AUUTHORITY, D.G. KHAN and 4 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2018 Sindh 631
RUSTAM ALI and others — Petitioners Versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2018 C L C 1777
RAZA MUHAMMAD GORAR and others — Petitioners Versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman and others — Respondents
Court: Sindh1993 C L C 63
Qari MUHAMMAD SIDDIO ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus DELIMITATION OFFICER, LIAQUATPUR and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2016 Sindh 63
Syed HAFEEZUDDIN — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary and 5 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2022 Lahore 607
TARIQ IQBAL — Petitioner Versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2019 C L C 1801
MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM JATOI — Petitioner Versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh