Home Maxims & Terms Plant and Machinery meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Plant and Machinery

Plant and Machinery legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 PTD 1495 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss.7, 8, 13, 47, 66 & 74S.R.O. No.578(I)/98 dated 12-6-1998S.R.O. No.978(I)/99 dated 30-8-1999 [Sales Tax General Order 2]Input and output taxAdjustmentPlant and machineryTerm 'stock-in-trade'Applicability

Petitioner assailed show cause notice, whereby claim of Rs.1.020 million was refused to be allowed as input adjustment under notification S.R.O. No.578(I)/98, dated 12-6-1998

Validity

Generators in question were imported, installed and made to use in manufacturing process by petitioner and the same were considered as 'plant and machinery' and had come within the definition of term 'stock-in-trade' and fell outside the mischief of excluding provision provided under notification S.R.O. No.578(I)/98, dated 12-6-1998

Show-cause notice, whereby claim of Rs.1.020 million was refused to be allowed as input adjustment under notification S.R.O. No.578(I)/98, dated 12-6-1998, was not legally correct

Generator in question was in fact a 'stock-in-trade' and could not be excluded from the goods which could not avail input adjustment as provided under Show cause notice, whereby claim of Rs.1.020 million was refused to be allowed as input adjustment under notification S.R.O. No.578(I)/98, dated 12-6-1998

Authorities failed to consider such crucial legal issue

Input tax adjustment on generator which was used for manufacturing purpose could be adjusted in output tax of petitioner, as it did not fall within mischief of show cause notice, whereby claim of Rs.1.020 million was refused to be allowed as input adjustment under notification S.R.O. No.578(I)98, dated 12-6-1998

High Court directed the authorities to revisit claim of input adjustment of Rs.1.020 million made by petitioner, in view of 1st proviso to S. 66 read with 74 of Sales Tax Act, 1990, and guidelines provided under STGO No.2 and notification S.R.O. 978(I)/99, dated 30-8-1999

Reference was disposed of accordingly.

2005 PLD 577 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
What includes

" Plant and machinery" are not two different entities because a plant cannot be functional without machinery and machinery being integral part of the plant, both "plant and machinery" can be considered interchangeable and synonymous keeping in view a little difference between the two and their dependence upon each 'other because they are not separable and a plant cannot be made functional without a machine

Principles.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Plant and Machinery", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/41632

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Plant and Machinery"

PTD 2006
I.T.A. No.1296/KB of 2003, decided on 2nd November, 2004.

2006 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2004
Civil Petitions Nos.4255‑L to 4258‑L of 2002, decided on 4th March, 2003.

2004 P T D 2214

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPRAISEMENT) CUSTOM HOUSE, LAHORE and others Versus Messrs M. RAMZAN SEWING MACHINES COMPANY and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 1995
Income-tax Reference No.329 in CA. No.372/(Cal) of 1987, decided on 6th, February, 1992.

1995 P T D 385

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus TRIBENI TISSUES LTD.

Court: 206 ITR 92
PLD 1988
Writ Petition. NO. 2577 of 1988, heard on 2nd July, 1988.

P L D 1988 Lahore 533

ARSHAD TEXTILE MILLS LTD. and another‑‑Petitioners Versus ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN‑‑Respondent

Court:
PTD 1999
Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 182 of 1995, decided on 5th November, 1996,

1999 P T D 3438

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus VIPPY SOLVEX PRODUCTS (P.) LTD

Court: 230 I T R 92
SCMR 2005
Civil Petitions Nos.4255 to 4258-L of 2002, decided on 4th March, 2003.

2005 S C M R 1352

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPRAISEMENT) CUSTOM HOUSE, LAHORE and others — Petitioners Versus Messrs M. RAMZAN SEWING MACHINES COMPANY and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 1987
I.T.As. Nos. 68/PB, 69/PB and 57/PB of 1985-86, decided on 28th July, 1987.

1987 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
SCMR 1977
Civil Appeal No. 279 of 1970, decided on 30th May 1977.

1977 S C M R 328

LAHORE ZONE LAHORE — Appellants Versus Messrs TAJ COMPANY LTD., LAHORE Respondents

Court: High Court
PTD 1991
I.TAs. Nos.2475/LB, 2412/LB and 2413/LB of 1985-86, decided on 30th April, 1990.

1991 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 1999
M.C.C. No. 107 of 1994, decided on 25th September, 1996.

1999 P T D 1752

RAMDEO TILES Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 227 I T R 463