Equitable Title
Equitable Title legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Meaning.
"Equitable Title", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/6423
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Equitable Title"
2017 S C M R 316
Syed HAKEEM SHAH (DECEASED) through LRs and others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD IDREES and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2002 C L D 1071
SHAUKAT ALI MIAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus TRUST LEASING CORPORATION LTD. through Chief Executive, and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1982 P T D 305
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus BHARAT NIDHI LTD.
Court: Delhi High Court (India)2011 S C M R 1160
Ch. ALI HASSAN — Appellant Versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2010 C L C 407
MUHAMMAD NAWAZ MAGSI — Applicant Versus Haji ILLAHI BUX and others — Respondents
Court: Karachi1992 C L C 833
Before Syed Haider Ali Pirzada, J Versus m.v. NARAN and 3 others‑‑‑Defendants
Court: KarachiP L D 2005 Supreme Court 775
MUHAMMAD HAYAT and others — Appellants Versus SARWAR KHAN and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1984 Karachi 401
RAMZAN ALI‑Petitioner Versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION
Court: ‑‑ Ss. 2 (c) & 22 as amended by Electricity (Amendment) Ordi nance (LXII of 1979)‑Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), S. 53‑A "Occupier"‑Buyer havinf paid entire price of one shop and substantial amount for other and put to possession by seller to both shops in part performance‑Buyer, held, was an "occupier" of such shops and thus a "consumer" within meaning of S. 2(c)‑Occupier must not show that he was owner of shop where electricity was to be supplied‑Sufficient material present to show that possession of buyer was lawful and he had an equitable title protected by S. 53‑A, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Electricity Company, under S. 22, held, was obliged on an application made, to supply energy, to such person, subject to fulfilment of condi tions mentioned therein‑A9agulpur Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. Hari Prasad Shah and others A 1 R 1938 Patna 15 and Aswini Kumar Samanta v. Manager, Calcutta Electric Supply Corporation Limited A I R 1955 Cal. 24 held not applicable.1968 SCM R 593
SHER MUHAMMAD AND OTHERS-Appellants Versus CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER — Respondents
Court: High Court1980 C L C 1450
SAID HABIB-Appellant Versus Haji MATIUR REHMAN AND 5 OTHERS-Respondents
Court: Peshawar