Home Maxims & Terms Negotiate meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Negotiate

Negotiate legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2002 CLD 1583 APPELLANT-BENCH-SECURITY-AND-EXCHANGE-COMMISSION Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesNegotiate "

Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Negotiate", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/6436

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Negotiate"

PLD 1976
Miscellaneous Appeal No. 143 of 1973, decided on 15th September 1975.

P L D 1976 Karachi 116

MESSRS HOOSEN BROTHERS LTD., KARACHI‑Appellant Versus MESSRS LAKHANI CORPORATION, KARACHI‑Respondent

Court:
CLC 2007
2006-April-3

2007 C L C 77

Sardar SHAFIQ HYDER KHAN LAGHARI — Petitioner Versus Syed TASNEEM NAWAZ GARDEZI — Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1994
Civil Petition No. 253‑L of 1994, decided on 11th May, 1994.

1994 S C M R 2085

SAEED AFZAL‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUMTAZ HUSSAIN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 2006
----Art. 212(3)---Termination of service of bank employees---Leave to appeal was granted by the Supreme Court to the employees to consider their submissions that no particular rule or regulation had been either mentioned or relied upon which could be said to have been violated; that documents appended by the employees with their replies to the charge-sheet and produced in appeal before the Service Tribunal and their defence plea had been ignored and their case was decided on the basis of news item about the alleged bad reputation of a customer of the Bank though all along the employees kept the higher authorities aware of the matter, therefore, they could not have been punished and that extreme penalty of dismissal from service could not be imposed for at the most it was a case of negligence and not of corruption even if allegations for the sake of arguments, without conceding, were admitted as correct.

2006 P L C (C

ISHTIAQ AHMED SHEIKH and others Versus Messrs UNITED BANK LIMITED and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2006
the basis of news item about the alleged bad reputation of a customer of the Bank though all along the employees kept the higher authorities aware of the matter, therefore, they could not have been punished and that extreme penalty of dismissal from service could not be imposed for at the most it was a case of negligence and not of corruption even if allegations for the sake of arguments, without conceding, were admitted as correct

P L D 2006 Supreme Court 94

ISHTIAQ AHMED SHEIKH and others — Appellants Versus Messrs UNITED BANK LIMITED and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLD 2003
Regular First Appeal No. 19 of 1990, heard on 15th August, 2002.

2003 C L D 521

AZHAR HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1953
First Appeal No. 81 of 1949, decided on 18th December 1952, from the decree of the Court of D. Fazl‑ud‑Din, Senior Civil Judge, Lahore dated the 6th day of July 1949, dismissing the plaintiff's suit with costs against defendant No. 1.

P L D 1953 Lahore 117

(FRONTIER BANK LTD., LAHORE -Plaintiff‑Appellant Versus A. L. RALLIA RAM and others‑‑Defendants‑Respondents

Court:
YLR 2005
Civil Revision No. 130 of 2002, decided on 14th June, 2005.

2005 Y L R 3321

Syed KAUSAR ABBAS SHAH — Petitioner Versus SARDAR KHAN — Respondent

Court: Peshawar
CLD 2006
2006-February-16

2006 C L D 1011

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD and another — Petitioners Versus CITIBANK N.A., AL-FALAH BUILDING, LAHORE — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC 1989
Petition No. KS‑201 of 1987, decided on 12th July, 1987.

1989 P L C 92

PATTOKI SUGAR MILLS, POTTOKI Versus MUHAMMAD RASHID ABBASI and 13 others

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab