Home Maxims & Terms Due Course of Law meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Due Course of Law

Due Course of Law legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1992 PCRLJ 1370 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Due Course of LawDue course of law

Term `due course of law' means the regular normal process and effect of law operating on a matter which has been laid before it for adjudication.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Due Course of Law", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/6636

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Due Course of Law"

PLD 1952
17th June 1952, against the decree and order of Muhammad Humayun Khan, Sub‑Judge, Mardan dated 30th May 1951

P L D 1952 Peshawar 59

MIR GHAZAN‑Petitioner Versus ASIM KHAN‑Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1966
Civil Rule No. 400 of 1962, decided on 29th July 1964.

P L D 1966 Dacca 253

DR. KUDRAT ALI‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD MUNSAR ALI SARKAR‑Opposite‑Party

Court:
MLD 1986
Civil Revision Application No.59 of 1979, decided on 27th May, 1986.

1986 M L D 2962

S.A. MALI K‑‑Applicant Versus Dr. ASHRAF MAHMOOD‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
CLC 2000
Writ Petition No.311 of 1986, decided on 16th February, 2000.

2000 C L C 1267

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and 5 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ABDUL AZIZ and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2020
2019-December-5

2020 P Cr

ATTIQ UR RAHMAN — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, PESHAWAR and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
SCMR 1982
Civil Appeal No. 69 of 1978 in Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 72-R of 1978 decided on 16th March, 1981.

1982 S C M R 741

RIAZ AND OTHERS — Petitioners Versus RAZI MUHAMMAD-Respondent

Court: -----S. 13 read with Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 3-Consent Definition--Definition of "consent" or free-consent in Contract Act, 1872 applies to provisions of Specific Relief Act under residuary clause of S. 3 of Specific Relief Act.-Words and phrases.
SCMR 1980
Civil Petitions Nos. 3-R and 4-R of 1979, decided on 29th October, 1979.

1980 S C M R 343

MUHAMMAD-Petitioner Versus Mst. SHARFAN AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: -- Art. 185 (3)-Appeal to Supreme Court-Contention that oral evidence adduced by petitioner should have been relied upon parti cularly when old entries in revenue records could not be changed except in due course of law--Neither oral evidence relied upon by petitioner helping him nor revenue record establishing petitioner's claim-No justification, hell. made out for interference with concur rent findings of Courts below--Evidence
PLD 1979
Constitutional Petitions Nos. D-1003 and D-1667 of 1978, decided on 4th February 1979.

P L D 1979 Karachi 574

MUMTAZ ALI BHUTTO AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus DP.PUTY MARTIAL LAW ADMINISTRATOR, SECTOR 1, KARACHI Arm 2 OTHERS — Respondents

Court: -- Ss. 225-A & 225-B-Escape or attempt to -escape from lawful custody or confinement "Escape"-Means where one arrested or detained gains his liberty before he is delivered by due course of law-Detenu on his way back, from Court to Jail taken by his escort to his house for a short while and all along remaining ineffective control of escort-Nothing to show that. detenu did any act towards an attempt to escape---Held, charge of escape or attempt to escape groundless and unsustainable in circumstances of case.-Words and phrases.
YLR 2021
N/A

2021 Y L R 2259

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF IQBAL and others — Petitioners Versus ABID HUSSAIN and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
PLD 1965
Civil Rule No. 299 of 1962, decided on 20th May 1964.

P L D 1965 Dacca 269

DEBENDRA MOHAN DAS‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AFAZUDDIN alias AFSARUDDIN

Court: