Home Maxims & Terms Words not defined in relevant statute meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Words not defined in relevant statute

Words not defined in relevant statute legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1986 CLC 77 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases Words not defined in relevant statuteDictionary meaning, held, had to be followed.

[Interpretation of statutes].

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Words not defined in relevant statute", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/6637

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Words not defined in relevant statute"

CLC 1986
Constitutional Petition No. D‑870 of 1984, decided on 15th October, 1985.

1986 C L C 77

Messrs YOUSUF RE‑ROLLING MILLS‑‑Petitioner Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPRAISMENT), KARACHI and another‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
YLR 2011
Writ Petition No.12194 of 2010, decided on 4th April, 2011.

2011 Y L R 2780

Sayyed HANAN KHALID GILANI — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT JUDGE/PRESIDING OFFICER DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT MULTAN and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLD 2011
2011-April-4

2011 CLD 1105

Sayyed HANAN KHALID GILLANI — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT JUDGE/PRESIDING OFFICER, DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT, MULTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2011
2011-April-4

P L D 2011 Lahore 349

Sayyed HANAN KHALID GILLANI — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT JUDGE/PRESIDING OFFICER DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT, MULTAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
YLR 2008
Criminal Miscellaneous No.905 of 2008, decided on 24th May, 2008.

2008 Y L R 1974

MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PTD 2009
Writ Petition 42 of 2009, decided on 19th June, 2009.

2009 PTD 1602

PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LIMITED (PTCL) through Regional General Manager, Lahore Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, Lahore and 3 others

Court: Lahore High Court
MLD 1996
Constitutional Petitions Nos. D‑1534 of 1994, D‑2392, D‑3295, D‑3296 and D‑3428 of 1993, decided on 21st December 1994.

1996 M 1

MURTAZA FLOUR MILLS (PVT.) LTD. and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PTD 2001
I.T.As. Nos. 66 and 67 of 1999, decided on 22nd May, 2000.

2001 P T D 682

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus Messrs FAYSAL ISLAMIC BANK OF BAHRAIN, KARACHI

Court: Karachi High Court
PLD 2016
2016-March-2

P L D 2016 Supreme Court 492

MUHAMMAD KHAN — Appellant Versus OBAIDULLAH JAN BABAT and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLC(CS) 2004
Civil Petition No. 1365 of 2003, decided on 17th December, 2003.

2004 P L C (C

Syed IMAM SHAH and others Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W.F.P. and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan