Register
SCMR 2016

2016 PLP 1740 (SCMR)

N/A

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
N/A
Honorable Judges
Mushir Alam and Dost Muhammad Khan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2016 PLP 1740 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Mushir Alam and Dost Muhammad Khan, JJ
Parties N/A
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2016 PLP 1740 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2016 PLP 1740 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Mushir Alam and Dost Muhammad Khan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2016 PLP 1740 (SCMR) (N/A). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Judgment & Decree

(b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Ss. 497 & 227

(c) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

S. 497

Khalid Javaid Gilan v. The State PLD 1978 SC 256 ref. MWA/S-20/SC Bail refused.

Legal Tools

Metadata Directory

  • Journal: SCMR
  • Volume Year: 2016
  • Citation Ref: 2016 PLP 1740 (SCMR)

Cite & Link (Backlink Generator)

Are you writing a blog or referencing this case? Copy the optimized HTML link below to cite this judgment on your website and create a legal backlink:

HTML Backlink Code:
Text Citation:

Related Judgments

  • 2016SCUS704 ROBERT F. McDONNELL — Petitioner Versus UNITED STATES — Respondent
  • 2016 S C M R 1561 TERRANCE WILLIAMS — Petitioner Versus PENNSYLVANIA — Respondent
  • 2016 S C M R 1459 ABIGAIL NOEL FISHER — Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, ET AL — Respondent
  • 2015 S C M R 1152 SUE EVENWEL, ET AL — Appellant Versus GREG ABBOTT, GOVERNOR OF TEXAS, ET AL — Respondent
  • 2016 S C M R 1988 ANGOVE'S PTY LIMITED — Appellant Versus BAILEY and another — Respondents
  • 2016 S C M R 1940 CAMPBELL — Appellant Versus GORDON — Respondent