1986 PLP 476 (SCMR)
ALTAF HUSSAIN and another‑Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE and other,‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP 476 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C.J., Nasim Hasan Shah, and S.A. Nusrat, JJ |
| Parties | ALTAF HUSSAIN and another‑Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE and other,‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | C.P.S.L.A. No. 296‑R of 1985, C.P.S.L.A. No. 270‑ft of 1.985, Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 476 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: C.P.S.L.A. No. 296‑R of 1985, C.P.S.L.A. No. 270‑ft of 1.985, Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 476 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C.J., Nasim Hasan Shah, and S.A. Nusrat, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 476 (SCMR) (ALTAF HUSSAIN and another‑Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE and other,‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Raja Muhammad Anwar, Advocate Supreme Court with Muhammad Afzal Siddiqui, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Hanif Bhatti, Advocate Supreme Court with Khawaja Mushtaq Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
- Maulvi Sirajul Haq, Advocate Supreme Court with M. Afzal Siddiqi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- M. Hanif Bhatti, Advocate Supreme Court with Kh. Mushtaq Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 12th October, 1985.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners not pressing petitions‑‑Petitions dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment & Decree
S.A. NUSRAT, J.‑‑The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in both the above noted petitions does not want to press these petitions. The same are, therefore, dismissed as not pressed. However, the petitioners are given two month, time to vacate the premises in question and hand ever vacant possession thereof to the landlords, subject to payment of advance rent every month. The petitioners are present in Court and undertake to abide by the direction of this Court. M . Y . H .?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????? Petitions dismissed.