Judicial act
Judicial act legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Judicial Tact - Quasi-judicial act - Administrative act-Meaning, essence and difference.
"Judicial act", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1079
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Judicial act"
P L D 1956 (W
Diwan ZIAUL HAQ and others‑Petitioners Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN — Respondents
Court:P L D 1976 Quetta 77
MUHAMMAD YAQOOB-Petitioner Versus ZAHIR ALAM AND 10 OTHERS-RESPONDENTS
Court: -- Art. 199-Writ jurisdiction-Power of judicial review available to High Court-Does not extend to investigation into questions of fact or appraisal of evidence touching issues falling within authority of administrative tribunals or executive functionaries--Exception : where finding ex facie perverse and not supported by any evidence.-Writ.P L D 1956 (W
M. ABDUL MAJID‑Petitioner Versus THE WEST PAKISTAN PROVINCE and two others — ‑Respondents
Court:P L D 2021 Sindh 145
Mst. AMEER JEHAN alias BISMA NOUREEN — Applicant Versus The STATE and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1966 Supreme Court 628
KHALID M. ISHAQUE, Ex‑ADVOCATE‑GENERAL, LAHORE‑Appellant Versus THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE JUDGESOF THE HIGH COURT of WEST PAKISTAN,
Court: (b) General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S. 5(3)‑Central Act construed as coming into operation immediately on the expiration of the day preceding its commencement‑Rule applied by analogy, in applying a law to a place where previously it had not applied Sobho Gyanchandani v. Crown P L D 1952 F C 29 ref..P L D 1973 Lahore 304
ALAM DIN‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 2009 Karachi 120
MUHAMMAD HAROON and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: High Court1973 P Cr
Sh. RAFIQUE AHMED -Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ AND OTHERS — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court (A J & K)2025 C L C 1614
GHOUS MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ZAFAR ULLAH KHAN and others — Respondents
Court: Board of Revenue, PunjabP L D 2021 Lahore 499
Qari MUHAMMAD ARIF — Petitioner Versus SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT and others — Respondents
Court: High Court