ATM Service
ATM Service legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Term 'prohibited agreement', was applied to a wide range of practices, whereby competitions co-ordinate among themselves to prevent, restrict or reduce competition in the market
Most glaring example of prohibited agreement was co-ordination among the competitors to fix the price
Such anti-competitive agreement aimed to reduce price competition, raise price or effect price in a favourable way for the undertaking (Association of Banks in the present case) involved and certainly had the object and effect of reducing competition in the market under S.4 of Competition Act, 2010, prohibited agreement could also be exempted under S.5 of the Act
To seek such exemption, an agreement had to fulfil the criteria/ conditions laid down in S.9 of the Act
Section 9 of the Competition Act, 2010, essentially raised the question that whether there were efficiency gains of a competition restrictive agreement; and benefits were passed on to the consumers; or whether its pro-competitive benefits outweigh its anti-competitive harms
In absence of a collective agreement to standardize interchange fee, some of the members (Banks) could find incentives to increase their fee, while also expecting others to keep their fee low; in such situation of free riding, while their customers continued to enjoy ATM cash withdrawal service at cheap rates, the customers of other banks would generate greater revenue for them in lieu of a higher fee
If that trend would continue, every bank which owed large ATM networks, would find it in its interest to raise its fee at par with others in order to avoid the situation, wherefrom riding was taking place at its expenses
Free riding would threaten the very existence of the network by reducing, demand for such services and could result in fees much higher than that which was collectively set by the members (Banks)
Individually negotiated inter-change fee could have the effect of hampering production and distribution while also apparently threating the failure of a system that would contribute to economy.
"ATM Service", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124938846
Precedents & Case Laws citing "ATM Service"
2012 C L D 1762
Files Nos.1/24/ATM Charges/C&TA/CCP/2011, 2(317) and (318)/AGR/EXM/REG/CCP/2012
Court: Competition Commission of Pakistan2025 P L C (C
NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through President, Karachi Versus ROZ-UD-DIN and another
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2025 S C M R 160
NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through President, Karachi — Petitioner Versus ROZ-UD-DIN and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2006 Lahore 534
PREMIER INSURANCE COMPANY and others — Petitioners Versus ATTOCK TEXTILE MILLS LTD. — Respondent
Court: High Court2025 C L D 1517
HABIB METROPOLITAN BANK PAKISTAN LIMITED through authorized signatory — Appellant Versus PRESIDING OFFICER DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT SIALKOT and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2016P2202
PRESIDENT, MEEZAN BANK LTD. and 6 others Versus NASIR JALAL AWAN and 2 others
Court: Peshawar High Court2015 Y L R 2694
NUSRAT BIBI and others — Appellants Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore2026 P Cr
Muhammad Khan alias Akhtar Muhammad — Petitioner Versus The State — Respondent
Court: Balochistan2009 C L C 449
DESIYON DAVID & HICKS through Proprietor and others — Appellants Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through Regional Headquarter — Respondent
Court: Karachi2007 C L D 248
M/s. AIRSYS ATM LIMITED LONDON and another — Plaintiffs Versus CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF PAKISTAN and another-Defendants
Court: Karachi