Home Maxims & Terms ATM Service meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

ATM Service

ATM Service legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2012 CLD 1762 COMPETITION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
Ss. 4, 5 & 9Prohibited agreementAssociation of BanksATM ServiceIndividual exemptionCriteria for individual and block exemption

Term 'prohibited agreement', was applied to a wide range of practices, whereby competitions co-ordinate among themselves to prevent, restrict or reduce competition in the market

Most glaring example of prohibited agreement was co-ordination among the competitors to fix the price

Such anti-competitive agreement aimed to reduce price competition, raise price or effect price in a favourable way for the undertaking (Association of Banks in the present case) involved and certainly had the object and effect of reducing competition in the market under S.4 of Competition Act, 2010, prohibited agreement could also be exempted under S.5 of the Act

To seek such exemption, an agreement had to fulfil the criteria/ conditions laid down in S.9 of the Act

Section 9 of the Competition Act, 2010, essentially raised the question that whether there were efficiency gains of a competition restrictive agreement; and benefits were passed on to the consumers; or whether its pro-competitive benefits outweigh its anti-competitive harms

In absence of a collective agreement to standardize interchange fee, some of the members (Banks) could find incentives to increase their fee, while also expecting others to keep their fee low; in such situation of free riding, while their customers continued to enjoy ATM cash withdrawal service at cheap rates, the customers of other banks would generate greater revenue for them in lieu of a higher fee

If that trend would continue, every bank which owed large ATM networks, would find it in its interest to raise its fee at par with others in order to avoid the situation, wherefrom riding was taking place at its expenses

Free riding would threaten the very existence of the network by reducing, demand for such services and could result in fees much higher than that which was collectively set by the members (Banks)

Individually negotiated inter-change fee could have the effect of hampering production and distribution while also apparently threating the failure of a system that would contribute to economy.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "ATM Service", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124938846

Precedents & Case Laws citing "ATM Service"

CLD 2012
2012-June-28

2012 C L D 1762

Files Nos.1/24/ATM Charges/C&TA/CCP/2011, 2(317) and (318)/AGR/EXM/REG/CCP/2012

Court: Competition Commission of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 2025
Civil Petition No.3649 of 2023, decided on 12th September, 2024.

2025 P L C (C

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through President, Karachi Versus ROZ-UD-DIN and another

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2025
Civil Petition No.3649 of 2023, decided on 12th September, 2024.

2025 S C M R 160

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through President, Karachi — Petitioner Versus ROZ-UD-DIN and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2006
2006-March-31

P L D 2006 Lahore 534

PREMIER INSURANCE COMPANY and others — Petitioners Versus ATTOCK TEXTILE MILLS LTD. — Respondent

Court: High Court
CLD 2025
2025-May-26

2025 C L D 1517

HABIB METROPOLITAN BANK PAKISTAN LIMITED through authorized signatory — Appellant Versus PRESIDING OFFICER DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT SIALKOT and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC 2016
W.P. No.634-P of 2015, decided on 9th June, 2015.

2016P2202

PRESIDENT, MEEZAN BANK LTD. and 6 others Versus NASIR JALAL AWAN and 2 others

Court: Peshawar High Court
YLR 2015
N/A

2015 Y L R 2694

NUSRAT BIBI and others — Appellants Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2026
2025-September-15

2026 P Cr

Muhammad Khan alias Akhtar Muhammad — Petitioner Versus The State — Respondent

Court: Balochistan
CLC 2009
2008-November-28

2009 C L C 449

DESIYON DAVID & HICKS through Proprietor and others — Appellants Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through Regional Headquarter — Respondent

Court: Karachi
CLD 2007
2006-October-12

2007 C L D 248

M/s. AIRSYS ATM LIMITED LONDON and another — Plaintiffs Versus CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF PAKISTAN and another-Defendants

Court: Karachi