Home Maxims & Terms Provincial affairs meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Provincial affairs

Provincial affairs legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2012 SCMR 1958 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Arts. 2A & 184(3)Constitutional petition under Art.184(3) of the Constitution concerning law and order situation in Balochistan ProvinceParliamentary system of GovernmentProvincial affairsProvincial Government, responsibility ofScope

Federating units like Provincial Government and others in a parliamentary system of Government enjoyed provincial autonomy, thus (they) were responsible to ensure that affairs of the Provinces were run independently according to the constitutional provisions.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Provincial affairs", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124938904

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Provincial affairs"

PLD 1973
Petition No. 217 of 1972, decided on 18th July 1972.

P L D 1973 Karachi 78

LIAQUAT ALI‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SIND THROUGH SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: S. 3, as amended‑Preventive detention, law relating to‑Grounds which superior Courts generally take into consideration to determine validity or otherwise of preventive detention.
CLC 1984
Constitutional Petition No. 656 of 1973, decided on 20th October, 1983.

1984 C L C 2429

DR. AHMAD BASHIR‑ — Petitioner Versus THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT

Court: Karachi
PLD 1979
Constitutional Petition No. D‑243 of 1978, decided on 4th October 1978.

P L D 1979 Karachi 246

MUHAMMAD ASLAM‑Petitioner Versus NATIONAL SHIPPING CORPORATION, KARACHI THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: Art. 199‑Constitutional safeguards available to civil servants against arbitrary dismissal or removal from service‑Held, not avail able to servants of registered Company or a statutory Corporation ---Such servants to be governed by general law of master and servant and only remedy available to them is to sue for damages for wrongful dismissal and not for writ of mandamus or certiorari.‑Civil service-- Master and servant.
MLD 1994
1994-March-29

1994 M L D 2500

SHAMS-UD-DIN and 10 others — Petitioners Versus SPEAKER, BALOCHISTAN PROVINCIAL ASSEMBLY, QUE-17A and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Quetta
PLC(CS) 1995
Constitutional Petition No.513 of 1993, decided on 29th March, 1994.

1995 P L C (C

SHAMS‑UD‑DIN and 10 others Versus SPEAKER, BALOCHISTAN PROVINCIAL ASSEMBLY, QUETTA and 2 others

Court: Quetta High Court
PTD 1960
Original Suit No. 2 of 1952, decided on 8th November 1955.

1960 P T D 1052

THE PUNJAB PROVINCE Versus THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Court: Federal Court (Pakistan)
PLD 1956
Original Suit No. 2 of 1952, decided on 8th November 1955.

P L D 1956 Federal Court 72

THE PUNJAB PROVINCE‑Plaintiff Versus THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN‑‑Defendant

Court:
SCMR 2012
Constitution Petition No.77 of 2010, H.R.Cs. Nos. 13124-P, 40403-P, 40220-G, 43103-B of 2011, 17712-B, 27045-K, 27619-G, 30044-B, 30047-G, 30711-B, 30713-B of 2012, C.M.As. Nos.42, 43, 178-Q, 219-Q, 431-Q and 516-Q of 2012, decided on 12th October, 2012.

2012 SCMR 1958

PRESIDENT BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1967
27th May 1966

P L D 1967 Lahore 1251

DR. ABDUL HAFEEZ-Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, LAHORE AND THERS-Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2023
Writ Petition No. 63835 of 2021, heard on 26th January, 2022.

P L D 2023 Lahore 313

MURATIB ALI ALVI — Petitioner Versus The PUNJAB BAR COUNCIL, LAHORE through Chairman — Respondent

Court: