Home Maxims & Terms Reduction in fine meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Reduction in fine

Reduction in fine legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2012 PTD 1962 Customs, Federal Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal Judicial Precedent
Ss. 2(b), (s), 156(1)(89), 157, 168, 181 & 194-AS. R.O. 499(1)/ 2009, dated 13-6-2009SmugglingConfiscation of smuggled goodsOption to pay fine in lieu of confiscationReduction in fineAlleged smuggled goods along with carrier/vehicle were seized under Ss.168 and 157 of Customs Act, 1969

Adjudicating Officer, on option of importer vide order-in-original released goods along with vehicle against payment of 20% redemption fine of its assessed value

Collector (Appeals) reduced said fine

Order of reduction of fine had been challenged by the department in appeal before the Appellate Tribunal contending that impugned order was against the law as Collector (Appeals) had exceeded the powers conferred on him by Customs Act, 1969

Validity

Under provisions of 5.181 of the Customs Act, 1969, Federal Board of Revenue was competent to issues order to specify the goods where option of fine in lieu of confiscation would not be given as per first Proviso of S.181

Second Proviso of S.181 of Customs Act, 1969 empowered the Board to fix the amount of fine which in lieu of confiscation would be imposed on any goods

Order issued by the Board under S.181 of Customs Act, 1969 was binding on the appropriate officers directing confiscation of goods

Goods were rightly released vide order-in­original against payment of 20% redemption fine of customs value of the impugned vehicle

Collector (Appeals), in circumstances, was not justified in modifying order-in-original

Impugned order was set aside.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Reduction in fine", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939049

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Reduction in fine"

SCMR 2021
Criminal Petition No.14-Q of 2021, decided on 31st March, 2021.

2021 S C M R 1771

NASEEM KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 2001
Criminal Appeal No. 142‑L of 2000, decided on 28th September, 2000.

2001 M L D 378

KAMRAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Federal Shariat Court
SCMR 2021
Criminal Appeal No.125 of 2020, decided on 27th October, 2020.

2021 S C M R 109

Mst. SUGHRAN and another — Appellants Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2007
Jail Petition No.243 of 2005, decided on 24th April, 2006.

2007 S C M R 1905

GUL KHITAB — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 1997
Criminal Appeal No. 301 of 1990, heard on 30th November, 1992.

1997 M L D 2443

MUSTAFA‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 2011
Criminal Appeal No. 359 of 2009, decided on 14th January, 2010.

2011 SCMR 1034

SANJHA — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PCRLJ 1996
Jail Criminal Appeal No.33/I of 1996, decided on 8th May, 1996.

1996 P Cr

GHULAM HUSSAIN alias KAKA‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Federal Shariat Court
PCRLJ 1991
1991-May-11

1991 P Cr

KHUSHI MUHAMMAD — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1993
N/A

1993 P Cr

HIDAYATULLAH — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1997
Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.504‑L of 1993, decided on 20th March, 1994.

1997 S C M R 1411

GHULAM ALI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan